WhatsApp Inc. v. Intercarrier Communications, LLC

Filing 88

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 87 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Provide Supplemental Claim-Construction Briefing Regarding Claim 3 filed by WhatsApp Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 3, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Bar No. 183863 doug.lumish@lw.com RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Bar No. 204133 rick.frenkel@lw.com NATASA PAJIC, Bar No. 268144 natasa.pajic@lw.com KARAN S. DHADIALLA, Bar No. 296313 karan.dhadialla@lw.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 328-4600 Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 KYLE A. VIRGIEN, Bar No. 278747 kyle.virgien@lw.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant WHATSAPP INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 WHATSAPP INC., 18 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 19 20 21 22 23 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST v. STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIMCONSTRUCTION BRIEFING REGARDING CLAIM 3 INTERCARRIER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST 1 WHEREAS the Court issued an order allowing InterCarrier Communications, LLC 2 (“ICC”) to amend its infringement contentions to include Claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,985,748 3 on September 4, 2014. 4 5 WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. contends that it is necessary to construe this claim’s term “in a common database.” 6 WHEREAS ICC does not object to construction of this additional term. 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties and their 8 respective counsel of record and with the permission of the Court, that the parties will exchange 9 supplemental disclosures for the claim term “in a common database” conforming with the 10 requirements set out in Patent Local Rule 4-2 on or before October 6, 2014; that the parties will 11 file a supplemental brief addressing this term, not to exceed three pages exclusive of declarations 12 or exhibits, on or before October 8; that the parties will not rely in these disclosures or this 13 briefing on any expert declaration or testimony; and that the parties will be prepared to offer oral 14 argument on this term at the claim-construction hearing scheduled for October 14, 2014. 15 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 Dated: October 2, 2014 By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel Richard G. Frenkel LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Counsel for WhatsApp, Inc. Dated: October 2, 2014 By: /s/ Timothy Devlin Timothy Devlin DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC Counsel for InterCarrier Communications, LLC 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST 1 FILER’S ATTESTATION 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Richard G. Frenkel hereby attests that the 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories, which 4 shall serve in lieu of their signatures. 5 6 7 By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel Richard G. Frenkel LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Counsel for WhatsApp, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 S D _______________________ RDERE S SO O IHonorable Jon S. Tigar The IT United States District Judge 7 ER Ti ga r LI n S. J u d ge J o A H 10 RT 9 NO 8 R NIA 6 UNIT ED 5 October 2, 2014 Dated: ___________________ RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 2 ORDER N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?