WhatsApp Inc. v. Intercarrier Communications, LLC
Filing
88
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 87 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Provide Supplemental Claim-Construction Briefing Regarding Claim 3 filed by WhatsApp Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 3, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Bar No. 183863
doug.lumish@lw.com
RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Bar No. 204133
rick.frenkel@lw.com
NATASA PAJIC, Bar No. 268144
natasa.pajic@lw.com
KARAN S. DHADIALLA, Bar No. 296313
karan.dhadialla@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 328-4600
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
KYLE A. VIRGIEN, Bar No. 278747
kyle.virgien@lw.com
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: (415) 391-0600
Facsimile: (415) 395-8095
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
WHATSAPP INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
WHATSAPP INC.,
18
Plaintiff and
Counter-Defendant
19
20
21
22
23
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
v.
STIPULATION TO PROVIDE
SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIMCONSTRUCTION BRIEFING
REGARDING CLAIM 3
INTERCARRIER COMMUNICATIONS
LLC,
Defendant and
Counter-Plaintiff
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL
CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
1
WHEREAS the Court issued an order allowing InterCarrier Communications, LLC
2
(“ICC”) to amend its infringement contentions to include Claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,985,748
3
on September 4, 2014.
4
5
WHEREAS WhatsApp, Inc. contends that it is necessary to construe this claim’s term “in
a common database.”
6
WHEREAS ICC does not object to construction of this additional term.
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties and their
8
respective counsel of record and with the permission of the Court, that the parties will exchange
9
supplemental disclosures for the claim term “in a common database” conforming with the
10
requirements set out in Patent Local Rule 4-2 on or before October 6, 2014; that the parties will
11
file a supplemental brief addressing this term, not to exceed three pages exclusive of declarations
12
or exhibits, on or before October 8; that the parties will not rely in these disclosures or this
13
briefing on any expert declaration or testimony; and that the parties will be prepared to offer oral
14
argument on this term at the claim-construction hearing scheduled for October 14, 2014.
15
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
18
Dated: October 2, 2014
By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel
Richard G. Frenkel
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Counsel for WhatsApp, Inc.
Dated: October 2, 2014
By: /s/ Timothy Devlin
Timothy Devlin
DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
Counsel for InterCarrier Communications, LLC
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL
CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
1
FILER’S ATTESTATION
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Richard G. Frenkel hereby attests that the
3
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories, which
4
shall serve in lieu of their signatures.
5
6
7
By: /s/ Richard G. Frenkel
Richard G. Frenkel
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Counsel for WhatsApp, Inc.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL
CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
S
D
_______________________
RDERE
S SO O
IHonorable Jon S. Tigar
The
IT
United States District Judge
7
ER
Ti ga r
LI
n S.
J u d ge J o
A
H
10
RT
9
NO
8
R NIA
6
UNIT
ED
5
October 2, 2014
Dated: ___________________
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
2
ORDER
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL
CLAIM-CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING RE CLAIM 3
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4272-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?