Indiezone, Inc. et al v. Rooke et al
Filing
113
ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING: Exhibit List due by 7/17/2014. Witness List due by 7/17/2014. Evidentiary Hearing set for 8/6/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/6/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
INDIEZONE, INC., et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-04280-VC
Plaintiffs,
6
v.
ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY
HEARING
7
8
TODD ROOKE, et al.,
Re: Docket No. 104
Defendants.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
An evidentiary hearing is ordered on the defendants' motion for sanctions for August 6,
12
2014 at 10 a.m. The CEO for Indiezone and EoBuy, Conor Fennelly, is ordered to appear
13
personally to take the stand for examination and cross-examination.
14
additional witnesses as they deem necessary. If the parties wish to call any additional witnesses,
15
they must disclose those witnesses to each other and to the Court no later than July 17, 2014, with
16
a short description of why the witness is being called. The parties must also file exhibit lists, and
17
exchange exhibits, by July 17, 2014. The lists may be filed separately, and they should include a
18
short description of the exhibit and its relevance. Any objections to the other side's exhibits shall
19
be filed by July 31, 2014. The parties shall submit an exhibit binder to the Court by July 31,
20
2014, in the format required by the Court's standing civil pretrial order (except that exhibits may
21
be listed as being submitted by the plaintiffs or the defendants, as opposed to being labeled as joint
22
exhibits).
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties may call
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 6, 2014
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?