Swearingen et al v. Late July Snacks LLC
Filing
130
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 128 Continuing CMC filed by Late July Snacks LLC Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/16/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SHELTON DAVIS PLLC
David Shelton (admitted pro hac vice)
1223 Jackson Avenue East, Suite 202
Oxford, MS 38655
Telephone: (662) 281-1212
Email: david@sheltondavispllc.com
POLLACK SOLOMON DUFFY LLP
Joshua L. Solomon (admitted pro hac vice)
133 Federal Street, Suite 902
Boston, MA 02492
Telephone: (617) 439-9800
Email: jsolomon@psdfirm.com
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN 128515)
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: (408) 429-6506
Email: pgore@prattattorneys.com
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Rocky C. Tsai (CA Bar No. 221452)
Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 300
San Francisco, CA 94111-4006
Telephone:(415) 315-6300
Email: rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant Late July Snacks LLC
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
15
17
MARY SWEARINGEN and ROBERT FIGY,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
18
Plaintiffs,
16
19
20
21
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Current CMC Date: October 26, 2017
v.
LATE JULY SNACKS LLC,
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
1
Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate as follows:
2
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2017, the Court conducted a hearing on Late July’s
3
4
5
6
motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, at which the Court scheduled a case
management conference for five weeks from the hearing, so as to permit the parties adequate
time to discuss a proposed case schedule and the potential for ADR after receiving the Court’s
decision on the motion to dismiss (at that time, the Court anticipated a decision on that motion
7
in approximately one week);
8
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the parties agree that their efforts to confer on a case schedule and on the
potential for ADR would be facilitated by a decision on the motion to dismiss and adequate time
thereafter; and
WHEREAS, the motion to dismiss remains pending as of this date and thus the parties
13
have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, that a continuance of the case management
14
conference for approximately 30 days would result in a more efficient conference, increase the
15
potential for them to agree on scheduling matters, and facilitate discussions of ADR;
16
The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order continuing the
17
case management conference to November 30, 2017, or a date thereafter that is convenient for
18
the Court, with a joint case management statement due one week in advance of the case
19
management conference.
20
21
22
Dated: October 13, 2017
By:
/s/ Joshua L. Solomon
Joshua L. Solomon
Attorney for Defendant
LATE JULY SNACKS LLC
Dated: October 13, 2017
By:
/s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Attorney for Plaintiffs
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
11
ER
H
10
R NIA
n
M. Che
FO
RT
9
dward
Judge E
NO
8
IT IS S
LI
7
Honorable Edward M. Chen
D
U.S. District Judge O ORDERE
A
6
RT
U
O
5
Dated: _______________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
______________________________
TA
UNIT
ED
4
10/16/17
S
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?