Swearingen et al v. Late July Snacks LLC
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 10/8/2015. Further Case Management Conference sreet for 10/15/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/15/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2015)
4
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
Ben F. Pierce Gore (CA Bar No. 128515)
pgore@prattattorneys.com
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: (408) 429-6506
Facsimile: (408) 369-0752
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
POLLACK SOLOMON DUFFY LLP
Joshua L. Solomon (admitted pro hac vice)
133 Federal Street, Suite 902
Boston, MA 02492
Telephone: (617) 439-9800
Fax: (617) 960-0557
Email: jsolomon@psdfirm.com
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Rocky C. Tsai (CA Bar No. 221452)
Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 300
San Francisco, CA 94111-4006
Telephone: (415) 315-6300
Facsimile: (415) 315-6350
Email: rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com
Attorneys for Defendant Late July Snacks LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
20
21
22
MARY SWEARINGEN and ROBERT FIGY,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
23
Plaintiffs,
24
25
v.
26
LATE JULY SNACKS LLC,
27
Defendant.
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
1
Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate as follows:
2
WHEREAS, this action and the action captioned Swearingen v. Healthy Beverage, LLC,
3
Case No. 3:13-CV-04385 EMC, are both pending before this Court, both are brought by the
4
same two plaintiffs, both concern the issue of use of the term “evaporated cane juice” on
5
product labels, and both have been stayed;
6
WHEREAS, the Court has placed both this action and the Healthy Beverage action on
7
the same schedule, conducting a joint case management conference on May 14, 2015 and
8
scheduling a further case management conference in both actions for September 24, 2015;
9
10
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2015, the Court reset the September 24, 2015 case
management conference for September 23, 2015;
11
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2015, plaintiffs and defendant in the Healthy Beverage
12
action filed a stipulation and proposed order requesting a continuance of the CMC in light of the
13
Yom Kippur holiday;
14
15
WHEREAS, the Court has rescheduled the CMC in the Healthy Beverage action to
October 15, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.; and
16
WHEREAS, the parties respectfully suggest that, in light of the related issues in both
17
actions with respect to the stay in both actions, it would serve the interests of judicial efficiency
18
for the CMC in both actions to remain on the same date;
19
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the
20
Court’s approval, that the CMC in this action currently scheduled for September 23, 2015 be
21
continued to October 15, 2015 at 10:30 a.m., with the parties to file a joint CMC statement on or
22
before October 8, 2015.
23
24
Dated:
September 14, 2015
By:
/s/ Rocky C. Tsai
25
Rocky C. Tsai
26
27
Attorneys for Defendant
LATE JULY SNACKS LLC
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
1
2
Dated:
September 14, 2015
By:
/s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore
3
Ben F. Pierce Gore
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-2Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
9/15/15
Dated: _______________________
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
______________________________
TA
11
ER
n
M. Che
H
10
RT
9
dward
Judge E
NO
8
R NIA
7
OO
IT IS S
LI
6
Honorable Edward M. Chen
U.S. District Judge RDERED
A
5
UNIT
ED
S
4
FO
2
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
-3Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?