Swearingen et al v. Late July Snacks LLC

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 97 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC filed by Late July Snacks LLC Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/17/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 SHELTON DAVIS PLLC David Shelton (admitted pro hac vice) 1223 Jackson Avenue East, Suite 202 Oxford, MA 38655 Telephone: (662) 281-1212 Email: david@sheltondavispllc.com POLLACK SOLOMON DUFFY LLP Joshua L. Solomon (admitted pro hac vice) 133 Federal Street, Suite 902 Boston, MA 02492 Telephone: (617) 439-9800 Email: jsolomon@psdfirm.com PRATT & ASSOCIATES Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN 128515) 1871 The Alameda, Suite 425 San Jose, CA 95126 Telephone: (408) 429-6506 Email: pgore@prattattorneys.com ROPES & GRAY LLP Rocky C. Tsai (CA Bar No. 221452) Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 300 San Francisco, CA 94111-4006 Telephone:(415) 315-6300 Email: rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendant Late July Snacks LLC 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC 15 17 MARY SWEARINGEN and ROBERT FIGY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 18 Plaintiffs, 16 19 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Current CMC Date: June 23, 2016 v. 20 LATE JULY SNACKS LLC, 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC 1 Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate as follows: 2 WHEREAS, on May 26, 2016, the FDA issued a guidance titled, “Ingredients Declared 3 4 5 6 as Evaporated Cane Juice: Guidance for Industry”; WHEREAS, The parties agree that the stay currently in place, based on the primary jurisdiction doctrine, is no longer necessary in light of the May 26 Guidance; and WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed upon the appropriate next steps and 7 schedule for resumption of this action; 8 9 10 11 12 The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows: 1. The stay previously imposed in this action is lifted; 2. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file, and shall file by August 31, 2016, a Second Amended Complaint; 13 3. Leave to file the Second Amended Complaint is without prejudice to any defenses 14 Late July may have to the Second Amended Complaint, including but not limited to defenses 15 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6); 16 4. To accommodate defense counsel’s trial schedule in September, Late July shall 17 respond to the Second Amended Complaint by answer or motion by October 31, 2016; and 18 19 20 5. The CMC currently scheduled for July 28, 2016 is adjourned. reset for 11/17/16 at 10:30 a.m. by 11/10/16. An updated joint CMC statement shall be filed Dated: July 21, 2016 By: /s/ Joshua L. Solomon Joshua L. Solomon Attorney for Defendant LATE JULY SNACKS LLC Dated: July 21, 2016 By: /s/ David Shelton David Shelton Attorney for Plaintiffs 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified above) 3 11 ER R NIA dward Judge E n M. Che H 10 RT 9 NO 8 IT IS DIFIED AS MO FO 7 Honorable Edward M. Chen ED U.S. District Judge ORDER SO LI 6 UNIT ED 5 7/22/16 Dated: _______________________ RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA ______________________________ A 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER S 1 N F D IS T IC T O R 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?