Swearingen et al v. Late July Snacks LLC
Filing
98
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 97 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC filed by Late July Snacks LLC Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/17/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SHELTON DAVIS PLLC
David Shelton (admitted pro hac vice)
1223 Jackson Avenue East, Suite 202
Oxford, MA 38655
Telephone: (662) 281-1212
Email: david@sheltondavispllc.com
POLLACK SOLOMON DUFFY LLP
Joshua L. Solomon (admitted pro hac vice)
133 Federal Street, Suite 902
Boston, MA 02492
Telephone: (617) 439-9800
Email: jsolomon@psdfirm.com
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN 128515)
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: (408) 429-6506
Email: pgore@prattattorneys.com
ROPES & GRAY LLP
Rocky C. Tsai (CA Bar No. 221452)
Three Embarcadero Center, Ste. 300
San Francisco, CA 94111-4006
Telephone:(415) 315-6300
Email: rocky.tsai@ropesgray.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendant Late July Snacks LLC
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
15
17
MARY SWEARINGEN and ROBERT FIGY,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
18
Plaintiffs,
16
19
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING
SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Current CMC Date: June 23, 2016
v.
20
LATE JULY SNACKS LLC,
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
1
Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate as follows:
2
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2016, the FDA issued a guidance titled, “Ingredients Declared
3
4
5
6
as Evaporated Cane Juice: Guidance for Industry”;
WHEREAS, The parties agree that the stay currently in place, based on the primary
jurisdiction doctrine, is no longer necessary in light of the May 26 Guidance; and
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed upon the appropriate next steps and
7
schedule for resumption of this action;
8
9
10
11
12
The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order as follows:
1. The stay previously imposed in this action is lifted;
2. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file, and shall file by August 31, 2016, a Second
Amended Complaint;
13
3. Leave to file the Second Amended Complaint is without prejudice to any defenses
14
Late July may have to the Second Amended Complaint, including but not limited to defenses
15
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6);
16
4. To accommodate defense counsel’s trial schedule in September, Late July shall
17
respond to the Second Amended Complaint by answer or motion by October 31, 2016; and
18
19
20
5. The CMC currently scheduled for July 28, 2016 is adjourned. reset for
11/17/16 at 10:30 a.m.
by 11/10/16.
An updated joint CMC statement shall be filed
Dated: July 21, 2016
By:
/s/ Joshua L. Solomon
Joshua L. Solomon
Attorney for Defendant
LATE JULY SNACKS LLC
Dated: July 21, 2016
By:
/s/ David Shelton
David Shelton
Attorney for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER LIFTING STAY, SETTING SCHEDULE, AND ADJOURNING CMC
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified above)
3
11
ER
R NIA
dward
Judge E
n
M. Che
H
10
RT
9
NO
8
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO
FO
7
Honorable Edward M. Chen ED
U.S. District Judge ORDER
SO
LI
6
UNIT
ED
5
7/22/16
Dated: _______________________
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
______________________________
A
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
S
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 13-cv-4324-EMC
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?