Nada Pacific Corporation v. Power Engineering and Manufacturing, Ltd., et al

Filing 91

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court ORDERS the parties to meet-and-confer about them and to file a joint case management conference statement no later than 12:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 8, 2014. The court also SETS a Case Management Conference for 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, October 10, 2014 in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94131. The parties are welcome to appear at it through CourtCall, and they may make their own arrangements to do so. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/6/2014. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division NADA PACIFIC CORP, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Plaintiff, v. No. C 13-04325 LB ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13 14 POWER ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, LTD., et al., 15 16 17 18 [Re: ECF Nos. 71, 90]] Defendant AND RELATED COUNTER- AND CROSSCLAIMS _____________________________________/ This action arises from the failure of a microtunnel boring machine (the “boring machine”) 19 during a construction project that plaintiff Nada Pacific Corporation (“Nada”) performed for the San 20 Francisco Public Utility Commisison (“SFPUC”). In relation to a construction project, Nada 21 received a subcontract from SFPUC to construct a subsurface tunnel using a microtunnel boring 22 machine. Nada Complaint, ECF No. 6 ¶¶ 7, 14.1 Nada leased the boring machine used on the 23 project from Akkerman Inc. (“Akkerman”). Id. ¶ 20. The boring machine contained a gear box that 24 was designed and manufactured by Power Engineering & Manufacturing, Ltd. (“PEM”). Id. ¶ 27. 25 Besser Company (“Besser”) manufactured an iron casting that PEM used to manufacture the gear 26 box. Id. The gear box in the boring machine failed, which, according to Nada, caused the boring 27 28 1 Citations are to the Electronic Case File (“ECF”) with pin cites to the electronicallygenerated page numbers at the top of the document. C 13-04325 LB ORDER 1 machine to become immobilized underground. Id. ¶¶ 32-33. A rescue shaft had to be constructed to 2 get the boring machine out. Id. ¶¶ 38-39. 3 The parties all sued each other. In their case management statement dated August 21, 2014, both 4 PEM and Besser stated that they planned on filing summary judgment motions, see 8/21/2014 CMC 5 Statement, ECF No. 69 at 2, but only Besser did. See Besser Motion, ECF No. 71. Instead, PEM 6 filed a motion asking the court to determine that its settlement with Nada and Akkerman, which 7 came as a surprise to the court, was made in good faith. See PEM Motion, ECF No. 73. Besser 8 opposed PEM’s motion, and thereafter PEM filed a notice withdrawing its motion because its 9 settlement with Nada and Akkerman was rescinded. See Reply, ECF No. 90. 10 This raises a few issues. Given that PEM planned on filing a summary judgment motion prior to the now-rescinded settlement, the court wonders whether PEM still wishes to do so. If it does, it 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 may be best to hear PEM’s motion at the same time as Besser’s motion. It also may affect the 13 current case deadlines. To discuss these issues, the court ORDERS the parties to meet-and-confer 14 about them and to file a joint case management conference statement no later than 12:00 p.m. on 15 Wednesday, October 8, 2014. The court also SETS a Case Management Conference for 11:00 16 a.m. on Thursday, October 10, 2014 in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States District Court, 450 17 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94131. The parties are welcome to appear at it 18 through CourtCall, and they may make their own arrangements to do so. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 6, 2014 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 13-04325 LB ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?