Gray v. San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs' Association

Filing 18

ORDER RE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Hon. William Alsup denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 JON GRAY, 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, No. C 13-04340 WHA v. 12 SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION, 13 ORDER RE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendant. / 14 15 On November 5, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the order denying 16 his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This order notes that plaintiff states in his motion for 17 reconsideration that he is “unemployed and presently is not receiving net income” (Br. at 1). 18 Yet, he also states in the same motion that he “was recently transferred by his employer to work 19 in San Jose full time . . . .” (id. at 2) (emphasis added). Setting aside this contradiction, 20 plaintiff has failed to show sufficient cause to reverse the previous order denying his IFP status. 21 Thus, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 7, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?