Gray v. San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs' Association
ORDER RE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Hon. William Alsup denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 13-04340 WHA
SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFFS
ORDER RE MOTION FOR
On November 5, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the order denying
his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This order notes that plaintiff states in his motion for
reconsideration that he is “unemployed and presently is not receiving net income” (Br. at 1).
Yet, he also states in the same motion that he “was recently transferred by his employer to work
in San Jose full time . . . .” (id. at 2) (emphasis added). Setting aside this contradiction,
plaintiff has failed to show sufficient cause to reverse the previous order denying his IFP status.
Thus, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 7, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?