Gray v. San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs' Association

Filing 18

ORDER RE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION by Hon. William Alsup denying 17 Motion for Reconsideration.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2013: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8

JON GRAY,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

No. C 13-04340 WHA

v.

12

SAN FRANCISCO DEPUTY SHERIFFS
ASSOCIATION,

13

ORDER RE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

Defendant.
/

14
15

On November 5, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the order denying

16

his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This order notes that plaintiff states in his motion for

17

reconsideration that he is “unemployed and presently is not receiving net income” (Br. at 1).

18

Yet, he also states in the same motion that he “was recently transferred by his employer to work

19

in San Jose full time . . . .” (id. at 2) (emphasis added). Setting aside this contradiction,

20

plaintiff has failed to show sufficient cause to reverse the previous order denying his IFP status.

21

Thus, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 7, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE