Guilbaud et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al

Filing 85

Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 84 Motion to Shorten Time.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MATTHEW RIGHETTI, State Bar No. 121012 JOHN GLUGOSKI, State Bar No. 191551 MICHAEL RIGHETTI, State Bar No. 258541 RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94101 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 / Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 Email: matt@righettilaw.com Email: jglugoski@righettilaw.com Email: mike@righettilaw.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, the Collective and Putative Class 9 (Additional counsel on following page) 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 OLIVIA GUILBAUD, MARQUES LILLY, AND MICHAEL WONG, and all others similarly situated, Lead Case CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04357-VC Hon. Vince Chhabria Plaintiffs, 15 16 vs. 17 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION AND SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT CO., INC., 18 19 20 Defendants. _______________________________ Consolidated with CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02642-VC Hon. Vince Chhabria 21 22 MICHAEL SMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 23 24 vs. 25 SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant. 26 DENYING [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO HEAR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ON SHORTENED TIME (LOCAL RULE 6-3) AS MODIFIED Ctrm: 4 – San Francisco Courthouse Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO HEAR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ON SHORTENED TIME (LOCAL RULE 6-3) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RICHARD HOYER, State Bar No. 51931 RYAN HICKS, State Bar No. 260284 HOYER & ASSOCIATES Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 766-3536/ Facsimile: (415) 276-1738 Email:rhoyer@hoyerlaw.com Email: rhicks@hoyerlaw.com TODD M. SCHNEIDER, State Bar Number 158253 CAROLYN H. COTTRELL, State Bar Number 166977 NICOLE N. COON, State Bar Number 286283 SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-7100/ Facsimile: (415) 421-7105 Email: tschneider@schneiderwallace.com Email: ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com Email: ncoon@schneiderwallace.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO HEAR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ON SHORTENED TIME (LOCAL RULE 6-3) 1 2 3 The Court, having considered the parties’ papers, the entire record in this action, and the arguments of counsel, and good appearing therefore, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: 4 Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Hear Motion for Protective Order on Shortened 5 6 Time is GRANTED. 7 8 Defendant shall file its opposition by _________________________. 9 10 Plaintiffs shall file their reply by __________________________. 11 12 The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective shall take place on 13 _________________________ at ___________ in Courtroom 4. IST SD IT IS SO ORDERED RICT TE UNIT ED Dated: October 10 ______________, 2014 ________________________________ Hon. Vince Chhabria a United States DistricteCourt, br ia Cal. nc Chh N.D. u d g e Vi J H ER LI RT 20 FO NO 19 Plaintiffs should be prepared to mail notice the week following the hearing. D DENIE C R NIA 17 18 TA RT U O 16 S 15 21 22 A 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO HEAR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ON SHORTENED TIME (LOCAL RULE 6-3)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?