Schaeffer et al v. Piccolo Properties, L.P. et al

Filing 166

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 164 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF PAGE LIMIT ON MSJ BRIEFS filed by R.S., Ryan Schaeffer, Anne Schaeffer. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 27, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2015)

1
2
3
4

John R. Till
SBN 178763
Kirk M. Tracy
SBN 288508
PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP
1176 Boulevard Way
Walnut Creek, CA 94595
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6

Counsel for Plaintiffs Ryan,
Anne, and Reese Schaeffer

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12
13

RYAN SCHAEFFER, an individual; ANNE
SCHAEFFER, an individual; and REESE
SCHAEFFER, a minor by and through her
general guardians Ryan Schaeffer and Anne
Schaeffer,

14

Plaintiffs,

15

v.

16
17

GREGORY VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.P., a
California Partnership, et al.
Defendants.

18

Case No. 3:13-CV-4358 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMIT
FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY AND
DEFENDANT GREGORY VILLAGE
PARTNERS, L.P.’S RESPONSE
THERETO
Local Rules 7–2(b), 7–4(b), 7–12
Action filed: June 1, 2011
Discovery cut-off: August 14, 2015
Trial date: February 29, 2016

19
20

The Court granted Plaintiffs Ryan, Anne, and Reese Schaeffer leave to file more than one

21

motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment against Defendant Gregory Village

22

Partners, L.P. in this action. See ECF No. 113. The current deadline within which Plaintiffs must

23

file such a motion is this Friday, February 27, 2015. See ECF No. 142. As Plaintiffs have been

24

preparing their moving papers, it has become clear to them that they need five additional pages for

25

their memorandum of points and authorities beyond the page length limit provided by Local Rule

26

7–2(b) (i.e., 30 pages, instead of 25) due to the complexity of the relevant factual history of this

27

action and the number and complexity of the legal issues presented by their motion.

28

///

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: LENGTH OF BRIEFS ON MSJ

1

Accordingly, the parties hereto have agreed, and hereby request that the Court order, that

2

Plaintiffs shall be permitted to file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of their

3

motion of up to 30 pages in length and that Defendant Gregory Village Partners, L.P. shall be

4

permitted to file a brief or memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion

5

of up to 30 pages in length. That is, the parties hereto have agreed to each give the other and hereby

6

request that the Court give them each, five additional pages for their principal brief on the motion.

7

See L.R. 7–2(b), 7–4(b), 7–12.

8
9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Date: February 24, 2015

10

/s/
John R. Till, Esq.
Counsel for Plaintiffs

11
12

PALADIN LAW GROUP® LLP

Date: February 24, 2015

13

STANZLER LAW GROUP
/s/
Jeffery Curtiss, Esq.
Counsel for Gregory Village
Partners, L.P.

14
15
16

_____________________________
Jon S.SO ORDE
Tigar
IT IS Judge
U.S. District

20
21

RED

R NIA

February 27, 2015
Date: _____________________

ICT
C

ES
AT
T

RT
U
O

(Case No. 3:13-cv-4358 JST) ar
S . Ti g

J u d ge J o

H

ER

n

LI

RT

23
24
25

FO

NO

22

A

19

S

18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DISTR

UNIT
ED

17

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
-2-

Case No. 3:13-CV-4358-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: LENGTH OF BRIEFS ON MSJ