Schaeffer et al v. Piccolo Properties, L.P. et al

Filing 235

ORDER RE REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND ORDER RE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 234 MOTION for Reconsideration Regarding Order re Discovery Dispute (ECF No. 227) filed by Gregory Village Partners, L.P., 229 Letter filed by R.S., Ryan Schaeffer, Anne Schaeffer. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 3, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

RYAN SCHAEFFER, et al.,

Case No. 13-cv-04358-JST

Plaintiffs,
8

ORDER RE REQUEST FOR
CLARIFICATION AND ORDER RE
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v.
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

GREGORY VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.P., et
al.,

Re: ECF Nos. 229, 234

Defendants.

12
13

Now before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification of Order Regarding

14

Documents Listed on Defendants Gregory Village Partners, L.P. and VPI, Inc.’s Privilege Log,

15

ECF No. 229, and Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 234. The Court now rules

16

as follows regarding these various requests.

17

Plaintiffs’ Request for Clarification

18

Plaintiffs’ first request, that the Court set a deadline for the production of the documents

19

identified in its order of May 27, 2015, is granted. All such documents shall be produced by June

20

10, 2015. (The Court understands from Gregory Village’s response to Plaintiffs’ request, ECF

21

No. 232, that the documents have already been produced.)

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs’ second request, that the Court order the production of other documents not listed
on the privilege log, is denied. As described in the Court’s prior orders, the Court has now
resolved disputes concerning a sample of documents listed on the privilege log to give the parties
guidance regarding likely rulings on other documents. The parties must now meet and confer
regarding any remaining disputes regarding other documents on the log. See, e.g., ECF No. 104 at
3. If their meet and confer efforts are unsuccessful, they will submit their disputes to a Special
Master. ECF No. 227 at 3-4.

1
2

Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration
Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration asks the Court to reconsider its ruling regarding a

3

single document on the privilege log, Document Number 866. Plaintiffs must file either an

4

opposition to the motion or a statement of non-opposition by June 11, 2015. The hearing set for

5

July 9, 2015 is vacated.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 3, 2015
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2