Schaeffer et al v. Piccolo Properties, L.P. et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 82 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Estate of Sam S. Lim, Estate of Kathleen N. Taylor, Floyd G. Taylor. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 5 John R. Till (SBN: 178763) jtill@paladinlaw.com Kirk M. Tracy (SBN: 288508 ktracy@paladinlaw.com PALADIN LAW GROUP LLP 1176 Boulevard Way Walnut Creek, California 94595 Telephone: (925) 947-5700 Facsimile: (925) 935-8488 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 STEVEN B. BITTER (SBN: 156911) sbitter@gordonrees.com LAURA G. RYAN (SBN: 184363) lryan@gordonrees.com GORDON & REES LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 696-6700 Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 2 3 4 8 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants Estate of Kathleen N. Taylor, Deceased, Estate of Floyd G. Taylor, Deceased and Estate of Sam S. Lim, Deceased (only with respect to insurance coverage allegedly issued by Zurich American Insurance Company) 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 RYAN SCHAEFFER, et al., Plaintifs, 20 vs. 21 22 GREGORY VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.P., et al., 23 Defendants. 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04358-JST SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6-1] 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -1SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST [Local Rule 6-1] 1 2 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 Plaintiffs Ryan, Anne and Reese Schaeffer (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), and defendants 4 the Estate of Kathleen N. Taylor, Deceased, the Estate of Floyd G. Taylor, Deceased, and the 5 Estate of Sam S. Lim, Deceased (collectively the “Estates”), through their respective attorneys, 6 hereby stipulate as follows: 1) 7 8 Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit on or about June 1, 2011 in the Contra Costa County Superior Court. The matter was removed to this Court on or about September 19, 2013. 2) 9 Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) was served with a summons and the operative complaint (“Complaint”) on March 10, 2014 pursuant to California Probate Code § 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 10 550, et seq. on behalf the Estates. 3) 12 13 Plaintiffs and Zurich previously stipulated that Zurich’s response to the Complaint is due on May 9, 2014. The Court approved this stipulation on April 11, 2014 (see Dkt. No. 75). 4) 14 Zurich has advised Plaintiffs that it has conducted a diligent and extensive search 15 and has not uncovered any evidence that it or its affiliates have issued any insurance policies that 16 could provide coverage for any of the Estates in this case. Zurich is in the process of preparing 17 a declaration attesting to same which it will provide to Plaintiff as a basis for dismissing Zurich 18 from this matter. 19 5) In order to provide Zurich with sufficient time to prepare the subject declaration 20 and meet and confer with Plaintiffs regarding Zurich’s dismissal, Plaintiffs have agreed to 21 provide Zurich an additional extension through and including May 23, 2014 to file responses to 22 the Complaint on behalf of the Estates. 6) 23 Thus, Plaintiffs and Zurich hereby stipulate and agree that Zurich shall have until 24 May 23, 2014 to file responses to the Complaint on behalf of the Estates. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST [Local Rule 6-1] 1 7) The parties agree that by entering into this stipulation, the Estates do not waive 2 any affirmative or other defenses in this matter, including without limitation the right to assert 3 insufficiency of service of process, lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter 4 jurisdiction, or the right to challenge the use of Probate Code § 550, et seq. in federal court 5 generally or specifically as to any of the defendants. 6 7 STIPULATED AND AGREED: Dated: May 9, 2014 GORDON & REES LLP 8 By 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 13 14 Dated: May 9, 2014 15 /s/ Laura G. Ryan STEVEN B. BITTER LAURA G. RYAN Attorneys for Defendants Estate of Kathleen N. Taylor, Deceased, Estate of Floyd Taylor, Deceased, and Estate of Sam S. Lim, Deceased (only with respect to insurance coverage allegedly issued by Zurich American Insurance Company) PALADIN LAW GROUP LLP By /s/ John R. Till_____________________ JOHN R. TILL BRET A. STONE Attorneys for Plaintiffs RYAN, ANNE and REESE SCHAEFFER 16 17 18 19 S Dated: May 9, 2014 RED RDE ____________________________________ IS SO O IT JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT R NIA 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 21 RT U O 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA 23 27 ER FO . Ti ga r LI nS J u d ge J o A H 26 RT 25 NO 24 N D IS T IC T R OF C 28 1095415/19509175v.1 -3SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST [Local Rule 6-1]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?