Schaeffer et al v. Piccolo Properties, L.P. et al
Filing
85
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Ryan Schaeffer, Anne Schaeffer. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
John R. Till
SBN 178763 JTill@PaladinLaw.com
Bret A. Stone SBN 190161 BStone@PaladinLaw.com
PALADIN LAW GROUP LLP
1176 Boulevard Way
Walnut Creek, California 94595
Telephone: (925) 947-5700
Facsimile: (925) 935-8488
Counsel for Plaintiffs
Ryan, Anne and Reese Schaeffer
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RYAN SCHAEFFER, an individual;
ANNE SCHAEFFER, an individual; and
REESE SCHAEFFER, a minor by and
through her general guardians Ryan Schaeffer
and Anne Schaeffer,
15
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT [Local Rule 6-1]
Plaintiffs,
13
14
Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST
v.
GREGORY VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.P., a
California partnership, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
19
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT the parties hereto, through their respective counsel,
20
stipulate (subject to this Court’s approval) to an extension of the due date for Defendants the
21
Estate of Kathleen N. Taylor, Deceased (“Taylor Estate”), the Estate of Sam S. Lim, Deceased
22
(“Lim Estate”) and Floyd Taylor (counsel for Plaintiffs has represented that Floyd Taylor is now
23
deceased, although he was named and sued before his death) to respond to Plaintiffs’ Fourth
24
Amended Complaint (“Complaint”). “The Travelers Insurance Company” was served via
25
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metlife”) pursuant to California Probate Code section
26
550, based on an allegation that The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) or a Travelers
27
affiliate allegedly issued a potentially applicable liability insurance policy or policies insuring the
28
Taylor Estate, the Lim Estate and Floyd Taylor.
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST
1
These Defendants previously were given an extension to and including May 9, 2014 to
2
respond to the Complaint, through a Stipulation filed on April 11, 2014 (Document 75), filed by
3
counsel for these Defendants retained by other insurance companies that allegedly issued
4
potentially applicable liability insurance policies insuring these Defendants. For the reasons set
5
forth below, Travelers, on behalf of alleged policyholders the Taylor Estate, the Lim Estate and
6
Floyd Taylor, respectfully requests that this Court approve an additional extension to and
7
including July 9, 2014.
8
Good grounds exist for the requested extension as follows:
9
1.
Plaintiffs served “The Travelers Insurance Company” via Metlife with their
10
Complaint under California Probate Code section 550, pursuant to which “an action to establish
11
decedent’s liability for which the decedent was protected by insurance may be commenced or
12
continued against the decedent’s estate without the need to join as a party the decedent’s personal
13
representative or successor in interest.” Such an action shall name the decedent’s estate as the
14
defendant but the summons shall be served on the decedent’s insurer. Cal. Prob. Code § 552.
15
“Further proceedings shall be in the name of the estate, but shall otherwise be conducted in the
16
same manner as if the action were against the personal representative.” Id. “The insurer may
17
deny or otherwise contest its liability in an action under this chapter or by an independent action.”
18
Cal. Prob. Code § 553.
19
2.
The initial premise of this type of lawsuit is the question of whether the decedent
20
was indeed insured under a potentially applicable insurance policy issued by the insurance
21
company that is served pursuant to Probate Code section 550.
22
3.
Counsel for Travelers in this matter has represented to Plaintiffs’ counsel that the
23
Complaint was initially served erroneously on Metlife, a company currently unaffiliated with
24
Travelers, on or about March 10, 2014, and it was not until several weeks later, on or about
25
April 17, 2014, that it reached the intended “Travelers” recipient.
26
4.
Travelers is currently in the process of searching its records for copies of any
27
insurance policy issued to Kathleen N. Taylor, Sam S. Lim or Floyd Taylor that potentially may
28
be applicable in this case. This process includes searching for any policies issued by Travelers
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST
1
various affiliates, with the period at issue in this litigation spanning at least thirty years and dating
2
back more than half a century. Travelers has been in communication with plaintiffs’ counsel to
3
obtain additional information to assist Travelers in its search or otherwise confirm that Travelers
4
indeed provided liability coverage to any of these three Defendants or their predecessors-in-
5
interest. Communications between Plaintiffs’ counsel and Travelers counsel are ongoing at this
6
time.
5.
7
Travelers has requested the additional time to allow both Travelers and Plaintiffs
8
time to further research various avenues for insurance information and, based on the outcome of
9
such research, determine how Travelers will proceed.
6.
10
Travelers represents that it has proceeded with due diligence to promptly search its
11
records and also contact Plaintiffs’ counsel to address the preliminary issue of whether Travelers is
12
indeed an insurer of the Taylor Estate, the Lim Estate or Floyd Taylor as contemplated and
13
required under Probate Code section 550, with the hope of reaching a mutual understanding with
14
Plaintiffs’ counsel on this issue. Plaintiffs and Travelers agree that the extension stipulated to and
15
requested herein is warranted.
7.
16
This stipulation is not intended to be a waiver of any rights or defenses by Plaintiffs
17
or Defendants, or by Travelers (of any insurance coverage defenses it may have in connection with
18
this matter), and no estoppel is to result therefrom. Nothing in this stipulation is an admission by
19
Travelers that Travelers has any obligation, including without limitation any defense and/or
20
indemnity obligation, to the Taylor Estate, the Lim Estate or Floyd Taylor or any other person or
21
entity involved in this matter; nor is it an admission by Plaintiffs that Travelers does not have any
22
such obligation. Travelers reserves all of its rights and defenses in connection with this matter,
23
including but not limited to the right to contest (i) the issuance of insurance to Kathleen N. Taylor,
24
Sam S. Lim or Floyd Taylor, or their respective estates, and (ii) whether any defense and/or
25
indemnity obligation is owed in this matter. Plaintiffs reserve all their rights including, without
26
limitation, their right to dispute Travelers position regarding the issuance of insurance and whether
27
any defense and/or indemnity obligation is owed by Travelers in connection with this matter.
28
///
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST
1
2
3
Good cause appearing, by way of stipulation, the parties hereto respectfully request the
applicable due date for response to the Complaint be extended to July 9, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
5
Dated: May 16, 2014
PALADIN LAW GROUP LLP
6
7
By:
8
9
/s/John R. Till
John R. Till
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
RYAN, ANNE and REESE SCHAEFFER
10
11
Dated: May 16, 2014
McCLOSKEY, WARING & WAISMAN LLP
12
14
15
16
17
/s/Sonia S. Waisman
Sonia S. Waisman
Attorneys for The Travelers Indemnity Company,
erroneously served as “The Travelers Insurance
Company,” served under Cal. Probate Code § 550
as alleged insurer of Defendants
ESTATE OF KATHLEEN N. TAYLOR,
DECEASED; ESTATE OF SAM S. LIM,
DECEASED; and FLOYD TAYLOR (now
deceased)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
ER
H
24
25
. Ti ga r
FO
nS
J u d ge J o
LI
RT
23
JUDGE JON S. TIGAR
NO
22
Dated: May 19, 2014
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
21
UNIT
ED
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
18
R NIA
By:
13
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:13-CV-04358-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?