Verdina v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
Filing
17
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL BE PERMITTED TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. All parties are directed to appear telephonically at the January 10, 2013 Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 10, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jennifer B. Zargarof, SBN 204382
jzargarof@sidley.com
Francis S. Lam, SBN 279076
flam@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
Attorneys for Defendants
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and CVS RX SERVICES, INC.
7
11
Arthur C. Chambers (SBN 53282)
Joong Y. Im (SBN 163720)
Ilona BrusH (SBN 244723)
601 Van Ness Ave., Suite 2056
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 775- 2144
Fax (415) 775- 1308
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT VERDINA
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
)Case No. C-13-4359 MMC
ROBERT VERDINA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
17
18
vs.
19
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, a
Delaware Corporation; CVS RX SERVICES,
INC., a New York Corporation; AMRIT
VIRDEE, an individual; RUI CAMACHO, an
individual, and Does 1 through 20,
20
21
22
23
Defendant.
)JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
)THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL BE
)PERMITTED TO APPEAR
)TELEPHONICALLY FOR CASE
)MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ;
) ORDER DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO
) APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY
)Date:
January 10, 2014
)Time:
10:30 a.m.
Courtroom 7
)Place:
-----------------------------~)
24
25
26
27
28
LA 1 2910768v.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
II
1
Plaintiff, ROBERT VERDINA ("Plaintiff'), Emd
D~fendants,
CVS CAREMARK
2
CORPORATION and CVS RX SERVICES, INC. (collectively, "CVS"), hereby enter into this Joint
3
Stipulation.
4
1.
WHEREAS, on or about December 2, 2013, the Court entered an order continuing th
5
case management conference to January 10, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7, 19th Floor of the
6
United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco, California.
7
2.
WHEREAS, counsel for CVS resides and works in Los Angeles, California and
8
would prefer to appear for the case management conference telephonically. Counsel for CVS will b
9
able to adequately address all of the matters referred to in the Court's case management conference
10
order, and will have authority to enter stipulations and make admissions pursuant to the Court's case
11
management conference order, while appearing telephonically.
12
13
3.
appearance by counsel for CVS will not prejudice the parties.
14
15
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed that a telephonic
4.
WHEREAS, the Parties now request that the Court permit counsel for CVS, Jennifer
B. Zargarof. to appear telephonically for the Jimuary 10, 2014 case management conference.
16
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT:
17
5.
18
Counsel for CVS, Jennifer B. Zargarof, be permitted to appear telephonically for the
January 10, 2014 case management conference. Counsel for Plaintiff will appear in person.
19
20
Dated:
,d) 1D ,2o13
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA! 2910768v.l
------~---
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 0RDIJR
(PROPOSED) ORDER
2
The Court, having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation Requesting that Defense Counsel be
3
Permitted to Appear Telephonically for Case Management Conference, and good cause appearing,
4
orders as follows:
5
1.
6
2.
7
8
The Parties' stipulation is approved.
All parties are hereby DIRECTED
Counsel for CVS, Jennifer B. Zargarof, is permitted to appear for the parties' January
10, 2014 case management conference telephonically.
ยท IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
December 10
Dated: - - - - - - - ' 2013
The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA 1 2910768v.J
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?