Verdina v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al

Filing 17

JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL BE PERMITTED TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. All parties are directed to appear telephonically at the January 10, 2013 Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 10, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jennifer B. Zargarof, SBN 204382 jzargarof@sidley.com Francis S. Lam, SBN 279076 flam@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Defendants CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and CVS RX SERVICES, INC. 7 11 Arthur C. Chambers (SBN 53282) Joong Y. Im (SBN 163720) Ilona BrusH (SBN 244723) 601 Van Ness Ave., Suite 2056 San Francisco, CA 94102 Phone (415) 775- 2144 Fax (415) 775- 1308 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT VERDINA 8 9 10 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 )Case No. C-13-4359 MMC ROBERT VERDINA, ) ) Plaintiff, 17 18 vs. 19 CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; CVS RX SERVICES, INC., a New York Corporation; AMRIT VIRDEE, an individual; RUI CAMACHO, an individual, and Does 1 through 20, 20 21 22 23 Defendant. )JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING )THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL BE )PERMITTED TO APPEAR )TELEPHONICALLY FOR CASE )MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ; ) ORDER DIRECTING ALL PARTIES TO ) APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY )Date: January 10, 2014 )Time: 10:30 a.m. Courtroom 7 )Place: -----------------------------~) 24 25 26 27 28 LA 1 2910768v.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER II 1 Plaintiff, ROBERT VERDINA ("Plaintiff'), Emd D~fendants, CVS CAREMARK 2 CORPORATION and CVS RX SERVICES, INC. (collectively, "CVS"), hereby enter into this Joint 3 Stipulation. 4 1. WHEREAS, on or about December 2, 2013, the Court entered an order continuing th 5 case management conference to January 10, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7, 19th Floor of the 6 United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco, California. 7 2. WHEREAS, counsel for CVS resides and works in Los Angeles, California and 8 would prefer to appear for the case management conference telephonically. Counsel for CVS will b 9 able to adequately address all of the matters referred to in the Court's case management conference 10 order, and will have authority to enter stipulations and make admissions pursuant to the Court's case 11 management conference order, while appearing telephonically. 12 13 3. appearance by counsel for CVS will not prejudice the parties. 14 15 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed that a telephonic 4. WHEREAS, the Parties now request that the Court permit counsel for CVS, Jennifer B. Zargarof. to appear telephonically for the Jimuary 10, 2014 case management conference. 16 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED THAT: 17 5. 18 Counsel for CVS, Jennifer B. Zargarof, be permitted to appear telephonically for the January 10, 2014 case management conference. Counsel for Plaintiff will appear in person. 19 20 Dated: ,d) 1D ,2o13 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA! 2910768v.l ------~--- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 0RDIJR (PROPOSED) ORDER 2 The Court, having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation Requesting that Defense Counsel be 3 Permitted to Appear Telephonically for Case Management Conference, and good cause appearing, 4 orders as follows: 5 1. 6 2. 7 8 The Parties' stipulation is approved. All parties are hereby DIRECTED Counsel for CVS, Jennifer B. Zargarof, is permitted to appear for the parties' January 10, 2014 case management conference telephonically. ยท IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 December 10 Dated: - - - - - - - ' 2013 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA 1 2910768v.J STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?