Carlson v. Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 19

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE: Re 18 Proposed Order filed by Leroy Carlson. Counsel to make the necessary arrangements through CourtCall. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/24/2014. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ROBERT E. BARNETT, SBN 44162 rbarnett@wrongfulinjury.com DEVAN BENNETT, SBN 268328 dbennett@wrongfulinjury.com BARNETT LAW FIRM 712 Empire Street Fairfield, California 94533 Tel: (707) 425-0671 Fax: (707) 425-4255 Attorney for Plaintiff, LEROY CARLSON 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LEROY CARLSON, Case No. : 3:13-cv-04380-LB 11 Plaintiff(s), APPLICATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 12 vs. 13 / UNITED STATES, 14 Defendant(s), 15 / 16 APPLICATION 17 Plaintiff LEROY CARLSON hereby applies for leave to appear telephonically by Court 18 Call at the Case Management Conference on March 6, 2014. This application is made pursuant to 19 Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler’s Notice Re Telephonic Appearance Procedures, effective 20 August 1, 2013. 21 DATED: January 22, 2014 BARNETT LAW OFFICES 22 23 By: __/s/______________________ Devan Bennett Attorney for Plaintiff(s) 24 25 26 // 27 // 28 APPLICATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE 1 2 PROPOSED ORDER Pursuant to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler’s Notice Re Telephonic Appearance 3 Procedures, effective August 1, 2013, Plaintiff LEROY CARLSON’s Application to appear 4 telephonically by Court Call at the Case Management Conference on January 9, 2014 is hereby March 6, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. 5 GRANTED. 6 7 8 January 24, 2014 DATED:_________________ _______________________________ JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 APPLICATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?