Canonico et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER establishing briefing schedule on defendants' Motion to Stay filed by Assurant, Inc., American Security Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/12/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations PETER S. HECKER (Bar No. 66159) phecker@sheppardmullin.com DAVID E. SNYDER (Bar No. 262001) dsnyder@sheppardmullin.com Four Embarcadero Center Seventeenth Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4109 Telephone: (415) 774-3155 Facsimile: (415) 403-6224 FRANK G. BURT (pro hac vice) fburt@cfjblaw.com W. GLENN MERTEN (pro hac vice) gmerten@cfjblaw.com BRIAN P. PERRYMAN (pro hac vice) bperryman@cfjblaw.com RICHARD D. EULISS (pro hac vice) reuliss@cfjblaw.com CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A. 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Suite 400 East Washington, DC 20007-0805 Telephone: (202) 965-8100 Facsimile: (202) 965-8104 Attorneys for Defendant ASSURANT, INC. and AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 PATRICK URSOMANO, GIOVANNI CANONICO and URSULA CANONICO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO INSURANCE, INC.; ASSURANT, INC.; and AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 3:13-cv-04381-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY; DECLARATION OF PETER S. HECKER IN SUPPORT OF SAME Defendants. SMRH:417443012.1 3:13-cv-04381-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; DECLARATION IN SUPPORT 1 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, 6-1(b) and 6-2, it is hereby stipulated by and between the 2 3 parties, through their respective attorneys, that: 4 WHEREAS, defendants on February 7, 2014 filed a motion to stay these proceedings, 5 6 along with a motion to shorten time on the motion to stay; WHEREAS, the Court indicated it plans to consider the motion to stay on an expedited 7 8 9 10 basis; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that, subject to the Court’s approval, the briefing shall proceed on an expedited basis; 11 12 13 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to the Court’s approval: • 14 15 Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition to defendants’ stay motion on or before February 12, 2014; 16 • 18 Defendants shall file and serve their reply papers on or before February 14, 2014; • 17 The motion shall be considered at the earliest convenient date by the Court. 19 20 Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), Peter S. Hecker hereby attests that 21 concurrence by all signatories in the filing of this document has been obtained. 22 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 28 //// -1SMRH:414227320.1 3:13-cv-04381-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; DECLARATION IN SUPPORT 1 Dated: February 11, 2014 /s/ Peter S. Hecker Peter S. Hecker SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Attorneys for Assurant, Inc. and American Security Insurance Company Dated: February 11, 2014 /s/ Peter A. Muhic Peter A. Muhic KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Patrick Ursomano, Giovanni Canonico and Ursula Canonico Dated: February 11, 2014 /s/ Philip Barilovits Philip Barilovits SEVERSON & WERSON Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 UNIT ED S RT U O The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States DistrictRED DE Judge 17 18 O IT IS S OR 19 dward Judge E RT ER 22 A H 21 n M. Che LI NO 20 R NIA 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA _______________________________ 12 Dated: February ____, 2014 FO 14 N 23 D IS T IC T R OF C 24 25 26 27 28 -2SMRH:414227320.1 3:13-cv-04381-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; DECLARATION IN SUPPORT DECLARATION OF PETER S. HECKER 1 2 I, Peter S. Hecker, declare: 3 1. I am an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court. I am a partner with 4 the law firm of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, counsel for defendants Assurant, Inc. 5 and American Security Insurance Company in this case (collectively “ASIC”). I have personal 6 knowledge of the facts set forth below. 7 2. As set forth in the above stipulation, plaintiffs Patrick Ursomano, Giovanni 8 Canonico and Ursula Canonico (collectively “plaintiffs”) have stipulated that plaintiffs shall file 9 and serve their opposition to defendants’ motion to stay (the “motion”) on or before February 12, 10 2014; defendants shall file and serve their reply papers on or before February 14, 2014; and 11 consideration of the motion shall be at the earliest convenience of the Court. 12 3. Previous time modifications in this case include: • 13 14 the hearing on the ASIC’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 26) 15 • 16 • 18 • 20 23 24 25 26 On December 12, 2013, the parties stipulated to extend Wells Fargo’s time to respond to the First Amended Class Action Complaint. (ECF No. 29) 19 22 On December 5, 2013, the parties stipulated to extend Plaintiffs’ time to respond to ASIC’s motion to dismiss and ASIC’s time to reply. (ECF No. 28) 17 21 On December 4, 2013, the Court continued a Case Management Conference and On January 23, 2014, the Court continued a Case Management Conference and the hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss. (ECF No. 40) 4. Due to the minimal nature of the stipulated shortening of time, I believe that the requested extensions for consideration of the stay motion will not have any significant impact on the schedule for the case. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 11th day of February 2014 at San Francisco, California. 27 28 -3SMRH:414227320.1 3:13-cv-04381-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; DECLARATION IN SUPPORT 1 2 /s/ Peter S. Hecker PETER S. HECKER 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4SMRH:414227320.1 3:13-cv-04381-EMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; DECLARATION IN SUPPORT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?