Bastidas v. Good Samaritan Hospital LP et al

Filing 82

ORDER, Motions terminated: 81 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference and Set Briefing Schedule on Amended Complaint filed by Good Samaritan Hospital LP, Good Samaritan Hospital LLC, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/5/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 11/14/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 7/22/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 4 JAMES A. HENNEFER (SBN 059490) HENNEFER, FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 425 California Street, 19th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-2296 Telephone: (413) 421-6100 Facsimile: (413) 421-1815 Email: jhennefer@hennefer-wood.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff J. Augusto Bastidas 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 THAD A. DAVIS (SBN 220503) tadavis@gibsondunn.com MICHAEL LI-MING WONG (SBN 194130) mwong@gibsondunn.com VANESSA A. PASTORA (SBN 277837) vpastora@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendants Good Samaritan Hospital LP, a Delaware limited partnership, Good Samaritan Hospital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff, a California unincorporated association, Steven M. Schwartz, M.D., Bruce G. Wilbur, M.D. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION J. Augusto Bastidas, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Good Samaritan Hospital LP, a Delaware limited partnership; Samaritan, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff, a California unincorporated association; Steven M. Schwartz, M.D.; and Bruce G. Wilbur, M.D., CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04388-SI JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Susan Illston Complaint Filed: September 20, 2013 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI 1 2 WHEREAS, on April 16, 2014, Plaintiff J. Augusto Bastidas, M.D. (“Plaintiff”) filed a 3 Second Amended Complaint against Defendants Good Samaritan Hospital LP; Good Samaritan 4 Hospital LLC; Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff; Steven M. Schwartz, M.D.; and Bruce G. 5 Wilbur, M.D. (collectively, the “Good Samaritan Defendants”) and HCA Inc. for racial 6 discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; 7 8 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, on April 23, 2014, the court issued an order, per the parties’ joint stipulation, extending the deadlines to respond, oppose, and reply to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on May 23, 2014, the Court issued an order, per the parties’ joint stipulation, continuing the Initial Case Management Conference to July 25, 2014; WHEREAS, under the current schedule for the Case Management Conference, the deadline for the parties to confer under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 26(f) was July 4, 2014; 13 WHEREAS, on July 7, 2014, the Court granted the Good Samaritan Defendants’ motion to 14 dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and gave Plaintiff until August 6, 2014 to file a Third 15 Amended Complaint against the Good Samaritan Defendants; 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiff plans to file a Third Amended Complaint on or before August 6, 2014; 17 WHEREAS, although the Good Samaritan Defendants have not seen the Third Amended 18 Complaint, based on their understanding of the amendments Plaintiff is likely to make, the Good 19 Samaritan Defendants will likely file a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint; 20 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree that it would be efficient for the parties and 21 the Court to set a briefing schedule on any motion to dismiss the Good Samaritan Defendants may 22 file in response to the Amended Complaint; 23 24 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, upon the following schedule for briefing any motion to dismiss the Good Samaritan Defendants may file: 25 • Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint will be due on August 6, 2014; 26 • The Good Samaritan Defendants’ response to the Amended Complaint will be due on 27 28 September 10, 2014; • Plaintiff’s opposition will be due on October 8, 2014; 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI 1 • The Good Samaritan Defendants’ reply will be due on October 29, 2014; 2 • A hearing on the motion to Dismiss will be on November 14, 2014, or a date thereafter 3 that is convenient for the Court. 4 WHEREAS, the parties also agree, subject to the Court’s approval, to continue the Initial 5 Case Management Conference to December 5, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., as the Court’s ruling on the Good 6 Samaritan Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint will likely inform the scope 7 of discovery and schedule for this case. The parties also agree to file a Joint Case Management 8 Statement seven days before the conference. 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the parties agree that these modifications will bring efficiencies to the handling and scheduling of the case; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: 12 • Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint will be due on August 6, 2014; 13 • The Good Samaritan Defendants’ response to the Amended Complaint will be due on 14 September 10, 2014; 15 • Plaintiff’s opposition will be due on October 8, 2014; 16 • The Good Samaritan Defendants’ reply will be due on October 29, 2014; 17 • Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will be on November 14, 2014, or a date thereafter 18 19 that is convenient for the Court; • 20 21 The Initial Case Management Conference shall be moved from July 25, 2014 to December 5, 2014; • The parties will file a Joint Case Management Statement on November 28, 2014. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI 1 DATED: July 18 , 2014 HENNEFER, FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 2 3 BY: 4 5 /s/ James A. Hennefer JAMES A. HENNEFER Attorneys for Plaintiff J. Augusto Bastidas, M.D. 6 7 DATED: July 18 , 2014 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 BY: /S/ Thad A. Davis THAD A. DAVIS MICHAEL LI-MING WONG VANESSA A. PASTORA Attorneys for Defendants Good Samaritan Hospital, L.P., Samaritan, LLC, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff, Steven M. Schwartz, M.D., and Bruce G. Wilbur, M.D. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 7/22 DATED: _________________, 2014 By: _________________________________ HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI 1 FILER’S ATTESTATION 2 I, Thad Davis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference Set Briefing Schedule 4 on Amended Complaint. I hereby attest that James A. Hennefer has concurred in this and has 5 authorized me to affix his electronic signature to this Stipulation. 6 7 Dated: July 18, 2014 /s/ Thad Davis__________ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 I, Bonnie Honniball, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California, I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, CA 94105-0921, in said County and State. On July 18, 2014, I served the following document: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON AMENDED COMPLAINT 6 7 8 9 on the parties stated below, by the following means of service:  BY ELECTRONIC TRANSFER TO THE CM/ECF SYSTEM: On this date, I electronically uploaded a true and correct copy in Adobe “pdf” format the above-listed document(s) to the United States District Court’s Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. After the electronic filing of a document, service is deemed complete upon receipt of the Notice of Electronic Filing (“NEF”) by the registered CM/ECF users.  I am employed in the office of Thad A. Davis, a member of the bar of this court, and that the foregoing document(s) was(were) printed on recycled paper.  (FEDERAL) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 18, 2014. /s/ Bonnie Honniball 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PROOF OF SERVICE – CASE NO. 5:13-CV-04388-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?