Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. Silego Technology, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 9, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Michael J. Malecek (SB 171034)
BN
michael.malecek@kaye
escholer.com
Marisa Armanino Willi
iams (SBN 264907)
marisa.armanino@kaye
escholer.com
Robert S. Magee (SBN 271443)
N
robert.magee@kayesch
holer.com
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
P
Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 400
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, California 94
4306
Telephone:
(650) 31
19-4500
Facsimile:
(650) 31
19-4700

Robert T. Hasla III (SBN 71134)
am,
rhaslam@cov.c
com
Anupam Sharm (SBN 229545)
ma
asharma@cov.c
com
Charlin Chia-N
Ning Lu (SBN 271121)
[e-mail]
Patrick Norton Flynn (SBN 286108)
[e-mail]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
333 Twin Dolph Drive, Suite 700
hin
Redwood Shore California 94605
es,
Telephone:
[phone]
(
Facsimile:
[phone]
(

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Robert R. Laurenzi (NY Reg. No. 3024676)
Y
(Pro Hac Vice)
robert.laurenzi@kayesc
choler.com
KAYE SCHOLER LLP
P
425 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022-3598202) 783-6040
Telephone:
(212) 83
36-8000
Facsimile:
(212) 83
36-8999

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
D
Plaintiff SILEG TECHNOLOGY, INC.
GO

Terence Woodsome (SB 240908)
BN
[e-mail]
CYPRESS SEMICOND
DUCTORCORPORATION
198 Champion Court
San Jose, California 95134
Telephone:
(408) 54
44-1035
Facsimile:
(408) 45
56-1821
Attorneys for Plaintiff a Counterclaim Defendant
and
CYPRESS SEMICOND
DUCTOR CORPORATION

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR
RT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFOR
RNIA

20
21

Case No.

CYPRESS SEMICOND
DUCTOR
CORPORATION,

JOINT STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
L
AND [PROP
POSED] ORDER

22
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
P
Defendant,
D

23
24
25
26

5:13-cv-04412-MMC
5

v.
GY,
SILEGO TECHNOLOG INC.,
Defendant and
D
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
C

27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMI
ISSAL

Case No. 5:13-cv-04412-MMC

1

Plaintiff and Co
ounterclaim Defendant Cypress Semiconducto Corporation (“Cypress”)
or

2

and Defendant and Cou
unterclaim Plaintiff Silego Technology, Inc. (
(“Silego”) agree to the

3

following Joint Stipulat
tion of Dismissal With Prejudice and respectf
fully request that the Court

4

enter an Order as follow
ws:

5

WHEREAS the parties have entered into a confidential settle
e
ement agreement;

6

WHEREAS sub
bject to the terms of the confidential settlemen agreement, Cypress and
nt

7

Silego have agreed to d
dismiss their respective claims and countercla
aims with prejudice, with

8

the exception that Sileg may revive its counterclaims if Cypress files suit against Silego for
go

9

infringement of the sam asserted patents. Such dismissal shall appl only to Cypress and
me
ly

10

Silego and no other ent or persons, and does not apply to any succ
tity
cessor companies or

11

affiliates;

12
13
14

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of this Court,
Y
t
that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the claims an counterclaims in this
l
nd
case shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
d
n

15
Dated: May 8, 2014

KAYE SCHOLER, LLP

16
17

By:

/s/ Michael J. Malecek
M
Michael J. Male
ecek
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
DUCTOR CORPORATION
CYPRESS SEMICOND

18
19
20

Dated: May 8 , 2014

COVINGTON & BURLING L
LLP

21
By:

/s/ Robert T. Ha
aslam
Robert T. Hasla
am
Attorneys for Defendan and Counterclaim Plaintiff
nt
SILEGO TECHNOLOGY, INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMI
ISSAL

Case No. 5:13-cv-04412-MMC

1

ECF ATTESTATION

2
3
4
5

I, Michael J. Ma
alecek, am the ECF User whose ID and passw
word are being used to file this
Joint Stipulation of Dis
smissal With Prejudice and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with Civil
.
Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I a
attest that counsel for Defendants, Robert T. H
Haslam, has concurred in this
filing.

6
7

Dated: May 8, 2014

/s/ Michael J. Malecek

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the claims and
Y
counterclaims asserted in this action are hereby dismissed with preju
udice, with each party to bear
its own costs and attorn
neys’ fees in this action.

15
16
17

IT IS SO ORD
DERED.
Dated: May 9, 2014

18

HON. MAXINE CHE
ESNEY
UNITED STATES DISTR
RICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMI
ISSAL

Case No. 5:13-cv-04412-MMC