Hopkins v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 55

ORDER REMANDING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/18/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
DONALD RAY HOPKINS,
Plaintiffs,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

No. 13-4447 RS
REMAND ORDER

v.
AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
SERVICING, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/

16
17

In an order issued February 13, 2014, plaintiff’s federal claims against defendants Citibank

18

and AHMSI were dismissed. (ECF No. 50). Although his RESPA claims were dismissed with

19

prejudice, plaintiff was given leave to amend his RICO claims within thirty days. He was further

20

ordered to show cause within thirty days why his TILA claim against bankrupt defendant ABC

21

should not be dismissed.

22

More than thirty days have passed without plaintiff amending his complaint or attempting to

23

show cause why his TILA claim should not be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff’s RICO and TILA

24

claims are dismissed with prejudice. With no federal claims remaining, the court declines to

25

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff’s remaining state law claims. See Grossman v. JP

26

Morgan Chase, 2012 WL 5520402 (N.D. Cal. 2012) (declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction

27

after dismissing RESPA and TILA claims). This action is hereby remanded to state court.

28
NO. CV 13-4447 RS
ORDER

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/18/14

3
4

RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. CV 13-4447 RS
ORDER

2