Knudsen v. Cellco Partnership et al

Filing 66

ORDER, granting 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Filing of Second Amended Complaint and Request for Status Conference filed by Verizon Federal Inc., et al. Status Report due by 12/4/2015. Status Conference set for 12/11/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Chrles R. Breyer on 11/12/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MARCELLUS A. MCRAE (CA SBN 140308) mmcrae@gibsondunn.com HELGI C. WALKER (DC SBN 454300) (pro hac vice) hwalker@gibsondunn.com JAMES L. ZELENAY JR. (CA SBN 237339) jzelenay@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7449 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc. and other Verizon-related entities 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 Richard Knudsen, an individual, Qui Tam Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04465-CRB ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE 15 16 17 Plaintiff, Action Filed: Judge: v. Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc. et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP September 27, 2013 Hon. Charles R. Breyer 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the Parties November 9, 2015 Stipulation, the following is ORDERED: 3 1. Relator shall not file an amended complaint or any potentially confidential materials 4 on November 9, 2015, and Defendants will not seek default on account of Relator’s 5 not filing an amended complaint on that date; 6 7 2. A status conference to discuss this matter is set for Dec. 11, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.. The parties may appear telephonically. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Nov. 12, 2015 ___________________________________ The Honorable Charles R. Breyer U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?