Knudsen v. Cellco Partnership et al
Filing
66
ORDER, granting 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Filing of Second Amended Complaint and Request for Status Conference filed by Verizon Federal Inc., et al. Status Report due by 12/4/2015. Status Conference set for 12/11/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Chrles R. Breyer on 11/12/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE (CA SBN 140308)
mmcrae@gibsondunn.com
HELGI C. WALKER (DC SBN 454300)
(pro hac vice)
hwalker@gibsondunn.com
JAMES L. ZELENAY JR. (CA SBN 237339)
jzelenay@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: 213.229.7449
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants Cellco Partnership,
d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Inc. and other Verizon-related entities
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
Richard Knudsen, an individual, Qui Tam
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04465-CRB
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
Action Filed:
Judge:
v.
Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless,
Inc. et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
September 27, 2013
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the Parties November 9, 2015 Stipulation, the following is ORDERED:
3
1.
Relator shall not file an amended complaint or any potentially confidential materials
4
on November 9, 2015, and Defendants will not seek default on account of Relator’s
5
not filing an amended complaint on that date;
6
7
2.
A status conference to discuss this matter is set for Dec. 11, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.. The
parties may appear telephonically.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: Nov. 12, 2015
___________________________________
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?