Knudsen v. Sprint Communication Company LP et al

Filing 37

ORDER granting 35 Ex Parte Application for Order Extending Time to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Sprint Solutions, Inc., et al. Reset Deadlines as to 31 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Replies due by 4/20/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/10/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Colin H. Murray, State Bar No. 159142
[e-mail]
Brian K. Tomkiel, State Bar No. 267253
[e-mail]
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.576.3099
Attorneys for Defendants
Sprint Communications Company L.P.,
Sprint Solutions, Inc., and
Sprint Spectrum L.P.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

RICHARD KNUDSEN, an individual, Qui Tam
Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and United States
of America and its Federal Agencies, a public
entity,

14

Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19
20

v.
SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY LP,
SPRINT NEXTEL, SPRINT NEXTEL
CORPORATION, SPRINT SOLUTIONS,
INC., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., SPRINT
SPECTRUM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
SPRINT SPECTRUM LP, NEXTEL
COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED,
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID
ATLANTIC INCORPORATED and Does 1100,

21
Defendants.

Case No. CV-13-4476 (CRB)
Related Cases: CV-13-4465 (CRB); and
CV-13-4542 (CRB)
ORDER
GRANTING DEFENDANTS SPRINT
COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.,
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. AND
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
MOTION TO DISMISS

Date Action Filed: September 27, 2013

23

Hearing Date of Motion to Dismiss:
May 8, 2015
Time:
10:00 a.m.

24

Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor
Before:
The Hon. Charles R. Breyer

22

25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Two Embarcadero Center
11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 576 3000

Case No. CV-13-4476 (CRB)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
6731321

ORDER

1

The Court having considered the Ex Parte Application of Defendants Sprint

2
3

Communications Company L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P. ("Defendants”) for

4

an Order extending time for Defendants to file a Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss

5

Complaint, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Ex Parte

6

Application is GRANTED.
The time for Defendants to file their Reply is hereby extended to and including April 20,
2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2015

12

RED

The Honorable CharlesDE Breyer
SO OR R.
IT IS District Judge
United States

RT

14

J

ER

16

A

H

15

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

13

R NIA

11

UNIT
ED

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

9

FO

8

LI

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Two Embarcadero Center
11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 576 3000

1
Case No. CV-13-4476 (CRB)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
6731321