The Estate of Mohammed Shah et al v. City of Hayward et al
Filing
13
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 7 Motion to Dismiss.(lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
THE ESTATE OF MOHAMMED SHAH et al.,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
No. C 13-04516 LB
Plaintiffs,
v.
14
CITY OF HAYWARD et al.,
15
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
[Re: ECF No. 7]
Defendants.
___________________________________/
16
17
Plaintiffs Mohammed and Janifer Shaw are the parents of decedent Mohammed Shaw, and
18
Plaintiff C.E.W. is decedent Shaw's sole biological son. Complaint, ECF No. 1, ¶ 3. Plaintiffs filed
19
this lawsuit against the City of Hayward and Doe police officers, alleging that police officers shot
20
Mr. Shaw wrongfully in violation of federal and state law. Id. at 1-12. Defendants moved to
21
dismiss on the grounds that (1) Plaintiffs did not establish that they were successors in interest under
22
California Code of Civil Procedure § 377.32, and (2) the parents lack standing to pursue the
23
wrongful death claims (claims one and five). Motion, ECF No. 7-1 at 4-6. Plaintiffs concede that
24
the claims as pled are assigned to the wrong parties, say they can remedy the issues easily, and ask
25
to file an amended complaint. Opposition, ECF No. 11. Under the circumstances, the court
26
GRANTS the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiffs must file an amended complaint
27
within 21 days. This disposes of ECF No. 7.
28
DATED: November 15, 2013
ORDER (C 13-04516 LB)
________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?