Del Gallego v. Wells Fargo & Company Long Term Disability Plan et al

Filing 27

Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 26 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule for Cross-Motions for Judgment.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2014)

Download PDF
5 SEDGWICK LLP REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com MARK J. HANCOCK Bar No. 160662 mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 6 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOHN DEL GALLEGO, Case No. C13-4518 VC 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR WELLS FARGO & COMPANY LONG TERM JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISABILITY PLAN, and METROPOLITAN AS MODIFIED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 15 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff John Del 17 18 19 20 Gallego and defendants Wells Fargo & Company LTD Disability Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows: 1. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2580223v1 On October 24, 2014, the Court issued its order (ECF 25) adopting a briefing schedule previously proposed by the parties, under which plaintiff’s opening brief would be due on October 20, 2014, defendants’ opposition and cross-motion brief would be due on October 27, 2014, plaintiff’s reply and opposition to defendants’ cross-motion would be due on November 3, 2014, and the matter would be heard as a half-day bench trial on December 10, 2014. 2. On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, the attorney responsible for preparing MetLife’s briefs, Rebecca Hull, experienced a family medical emergency when her spouse 1 Case No. C13-4518 VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 sustained a severe back injury, which ultimately necessitated a lengthy hospital visit on Saturday, October 25, and has required most of her time and attention since October 22, making it impossible to complete the opening brief for MetLife in time for filing on October 27, 2014, under the current schedule. Upon discussion with counsel for plaintiff, the parties have agreed to the following extension of the current dates in light of this unexpected development and its anticipated duration to at least Wednesday, October 29, 2014, and request that the Court approve and adopt such dates: a. Plaintiff’s opening brief, October 20, 2014 [already filed]. b. Defendants’ brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in support of defendants’ cross-motion, November 6, 2014; c. Plaintiff’s reply in support of plaintiff’s motion and opposition to defendants’ cross-motion, November 17, 2014; d. Defendants’ reply in support of their cross-motion, November 24, 2014; e. Hearing/bench trial on December 10, 2014, as currently scheduled, or at the 17 Court’s convenience. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 DATED: October 26, 2014 19 By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway (as authorized on 10/27/14) Laurence F. Padway Attorneys for Plaintiff John Del Gallego 20 21 22 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY DATED: October 26, 2014 SEDGWICK LLP 23 24 25 By: /s/ Rebecca A. Hull Rebecca A. Hull Mark J. Hancock Attorneys for Defendants 26 27 28 SF/2580223v1 2 Case No. C13-4518 VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 ORDER AS MODIFIED 2 RT 10 NO 9 DIFIE AS MO ince J u d ge V ER 12 ia A H 11 Chhabr R NIA 8 VINCE CHHABRIA DERED United States S SO OR IT I District Judge D FO 7 LI 6 November 4, 2014 Date: _____________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 5 ORDERED. S 4 e Upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO UNIT ED 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2580223v1 3 Case No. C13-4518 VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?