Knudsen v. A T And T Corporation et al
Filing
72
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE re 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER: Status Conference set for 12/11/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/17/2015. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JOHN C. RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice)
jrichter@kslaw.com
ALEXANDER K. HAAS (SBN 220932)
ahaas@kslaw.com
DAVID P. MATTERN (admitted pro hac vice)
dmattern@kslaw.com
King & Spalding LLP
1700 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 200
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: 1 202 626 5502
Facsimile: 1 202 626 3737
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12 Richard Knudsen, an individual, Qui Tam
Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and United States
13 of America and its Federal Agencies, a public
entity,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
16
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4542-CRB
ORDER SETTING STATUS
CONFERENCE
Action Filed: October 1, 2013
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
v.
17 AT&T Corp, AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, and
Does 1-100
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. 3:13-CV-4542-CRB – [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
1
PURSUANT to the Parties’ November 9, 2015 Stipulation, the following is ORDERED:
3
1. Relator shall not file an amended complaint or any potentially confidential materials
on November 9, 2015, and Defendants will not seek default on account of Relators’
not filing an amended complaint on that date;
4
12/11/2015
2. A status conference to discuss this matter is set for _______________ at
2
5
6 IS SO ORDERED.
IT
7
8
9
Dated:
, 2015
___________________________________
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer
U.S. District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. 3:13-CV-4542-CRB – [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
a.m.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?