Knudsen v. A T And T Corporation et al

Filing 72

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE re 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER: Status Conference set for 12/11/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/17/2015. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHN C. RICHTER (admitted pro hac vice) jrichter@kslaw.com ALEXANDER K. HAAS (SBN 220932) ahaas@kslaw.com DAVID P. MATTERN (admitted pro hac vice) dmattern@kslaw.com King & Spalding LLP 1700 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: 1 202 626 5502 Facsimile: 1 202 626 3737 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 Richard Knudsen, an individual, Qui Tam Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and United States 13 of America and its Federal Agencies, a public entity, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 16 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-4542-CRB ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE Action Filed: October 1, 2013 Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer v. 17 AT&T Corp, AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility, and Does 1-100 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. 3:13-CV-4542-CRB – [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE 1 PURSUANT to the Parties’ November 9, 2015 Stipulation, the following is ORDERED: 3 1. Relator shall not file an amended complaint or any potentially confidential materials on November 9, 2015, and Defendants will not seek default on account of Relators’ not filing an amended complaint on that date; 4 12/11/2015 2. A status conference to discuss this matter is set for _______________ at 2 5 6 IS SO ORDERED. IT 7 8 9 Dated: , 2015 ___________________________________ The Honorable Charles R. Breyer U.S. District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. 3:13-CV-4542-CRB – [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE a.m.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?