Cartier International AG et al v. Carter Cellars et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS ENVY WINES LLC AND NILS VENGE filed by Envy Wines, LLC, Nils Venge. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/13/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Steven Sheriff Abern, SBN 148690
Benjamin A. Thompson, SBN 236590
HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys For Defendants
CARTER CELLARS, ENVY WINES, LLC, MARK CARTER,
CHRISTY CARTER, and NILS VENGE

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO

Attorneys At Law
Park Plaza Building
1939 Harrison St., Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510-273-8570

Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

CARTIER INTERNATIONAL AG and
CARTIER, a division of RICHEMONT
NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CARTER CELLARS, ENVY WINES, LLC, )
CHRISTY CARTER, MARK CARTER,
)
NILS VENGE, and DOES 1-10.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: C13-4544 EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS ENVY
WINES LLC AND NILS VENGE

19

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and through the

20

undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice

21

against defendants Envy Wines, LLC, and Nils Venge pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil

22

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

23
24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: February 7, 2014

FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.

25
26
27
28

By:

*/s/ John P. Margiotta
John P. Margiotta
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
*Mr. Margiotta provided his consent that this
document be electronically filed.

1
Cartier International AG, et al. v. Carter Cellars, et al./Case #C13-4544 EMC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendants Envy Wines LLC and Nils Venge

1

Dated: February 7, 2014

NARDELL, CHITSAW & ASSOCIATES LLP

2
3

By:

*/s/ J. Timothy Nardell
J. Timothy Nardell
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
*Mr. Nardell provided his consent that this
document be electronically filed

4
5
6

Dated: February 7, 2014

HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP

7
8

By:

/s/ Benjamin A. Thompson
Benjamin A. Thompson
Attorneys for Defendants

9
10

12

Nils Venge are dismissed from the above captioned action without prejudice.

14
Dated:

2/13/14

16

18
19

S

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

Honorable Edward M. Chen

VED
APPRO

20

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

ER

LI

J

A

H

23

RT

22

NO

21

R NIA

15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FO

13

The Court, having considered the parties’ stipulation, defendants Envy Wines, LLC and

UNIT
ED

Attorneys At Law
Park Plaza Building
1939 Harrison St., Suite 800
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 510-273-8570

ORDER

RT
U
O

Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
2
Cartier International AG, et al. v. Carter Cellars, et al./Case #C13-4544 EMC
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendants Envy Wines LLC and Nils Venge