A&S Liquidating Inc. v. AB&I Foundry et al

Filing 41

ORDER re 25 Stipulation filed by Randolph Holding Company, Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/13/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2013)

Case3:13-cv-04568-EMC Document25 Filed11/05/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall (Cal. Bar No. 102580)
Timothy L. O’Mara (Cal. Bar No. 212731)
Kirsten M. Ferguson (Cal. Bar No. 252781)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON
Everett J. Bowman (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Mark W. Merritt (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Lawrence C. Moore, III (pro hac vice forthcoming)
101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900
Charlotte, North Carolina 28246
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 704.373.3937
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Charlotte Pipe and Foundry
Company and Randolph Holding Company, LLC

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20
21

A&S LIQUIDATING INC., on behalf of
itself and all others similarly situated,

22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 13-cv-04568-EMC
STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

v.
[CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)]
AB&I FOUNDRY, TYLER PIPE
COMPANY, MCWANE, INC.,
CHARLOTTE PIPE AND FOUNDRY
COMPANY, and RANDOLPH HOLDING
COMPANY,
Defendants.

28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 13-CV-04568-EMC

Case3:13-cv-04568-EMC Document25 Filed11/05/13 Page2 of 3

1

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this case was filed on October 2, 2013;

2

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this case was purportedly served on Defendants AB&I

3
4
5
6
7

Foundry, Tyler Pipe Company, and McWane, Inc. between October 15 and October 17, 2013;
WHEREAS, the Complaint in this case was served on Defendants Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Company and Randolph Holding Company on October 16, 2013;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ responses to the Complaint, if service was proper, are currently
due between Tuesday, November 5, 2013 and Thursday, November 7, 2013;

8

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested additional time to respond to Plaintiff’s

9

complaint, and the parties agree and stipulate to extend Defendants’ filing deadlines pursuant to

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Local Civil Rule 6-1(a);
WHEREAS, no previous time modifications—whether by stipulation or Court order—
have been entered in this case;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned
counsel for the parties as follows:
1.

The time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is

enlarged to January 15, 2014;
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
Dated: November 5, 2013

19

Respectfully Submitted,
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall
Timothy L. O’Mara
Kirsten M. Ferguson

20
21

By

22

/s/ Kirsten M. Ferguson
Kirsten M. Ferguson
Attorneys for Defendants Charlotte Pipe and
Foundry Co. and Randolph Holding Co.

23
24
25
26

Dated: November 5, 2013

BAKER BOTTS
Joseph Ostoyich
By

Joseph Ostoyich
Attorneys for Defendants AB&I Foundry,
Tyler Pipe Co., and McWane, Inc.

27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

/s/ Joseph Ostoyich

1

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 13-CV-04568-EMC

Case3:13-cv-04568-EMC Document25 Filed11/05/13 Page3 of 3

1

Dated: November 5, 2013

Respectfully Submitted,
GOLD BENNET CERA & SIDENER LLP
Solomon B. Cera

2
3

By

4

/s/ Solomon B. Cera
Solomon B. Cera
Attorneys for Plaintiff A&S Liquidating Inc.

5
6
7
8

I, Kirsten M. Ferguson, hereby attest that the concurrence to the filing of this document
has been obtained from each of the signatories hereto.

9
10
By

11

/s/ Kirsten M. Ferguson
Kirsten M. Ferguson

12
13
14

SF\5624895

15

S

I

ORD
T IS SO

ERED

20

ER

LI

dwa
Judge E

A

H

23

RT

22

hen

rd M. C

NO

21

FO

19

November 13, 2013

UNIT
ED

18

RT
U
O

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2

STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 13-CV-04568-EMC