A&S Liquidating Inc. v. AB&I Foundry et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC FOR C13-4568 and all related cases. Case Management Statement due by 6/12/2014. Case Management Conference set for 6/19/2014 08:59 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/19/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall (Cal. Bar No. 102580)
Timothy L. O’Mara (Cal. Bar No. 212731)
Kirsten M. Ferguson (Cal. Bar No. 252781)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12

ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON
Nathan C. Chase, Jr. (Cal. Bar No. 247526)
101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900
Charlotte, North Carolina 28246
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 704.373.3937
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Charlotte Pipe and Foundry
Company and Randolph Holding Company, LLC

13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19

A&S LIQUIDATING INC., on behalf of
itself and all others similarly situated,

20
21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,
v.
AB&I FOUNDRY, TYLER PIPE
COMPANY, MCWANE, INC.,
CHARLOTTE PIPE AND FOUNDRY
COMPANY, and RANDOLPH HOLDING
COMPANY,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 13-cv-04568-EMC
(and all related cases)
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND DEADLINES UNDER FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26, AND
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINTS
[CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-2 & 6-1]
Courtroom: 5, 17th Floor
The Honorable Edward M. Chen

26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

[Caption continued on next page.]
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NOS 13-CV-04568-EMC & 13-CV-04792-EMC

1

LAS VEGAS SUPPLY, INC., on behalf of
itself and all others similarly situated,

2

CASE NO. 13-cv-04792-EMC
[Related Case]

Plaintiff,
3
v.
4
5
6

AB&I FOUNDRY, TYLER PIPE
COMPANY, MCWANE, INC.,
CHARLOTTE PIPE AND FOUNDRY
COMPANY, and RANDOLPH HOLDING
COMPANY,

7
Defendants.
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER

9

Based on the Parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

THAT:
1.

The CMC is continued, based on the Court’s availability, until at least forty-five

(45) days after the JPML resolves the MDL Motion. to 6/19/14 at 9:00 a.m.
2.

The Parties’ meet-and-confer deadline pursuant to Rule 26(f) is continued until 21

days after the JPML resolves the MDL Motion.
3.

The deadline for the Parties’ Rule 26(f) report and initial disclosures is continued

until fourteen (14) days after the Parties’ Rule 26(f) conference has concluded.
4.

The time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is

extended to twenty-one (21) days after (a) Plaintiffs’ file a consolidated complaint, or (b) if the

20

JPML denies the MDL Motion and this Court does not consolidate these related cases, twenty-

21

one (21) days after this Court denies the motions to consolidate. TES
A

24

RT

26

28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

dwa
Judge E

ER

1

A

H

27

hen

rd M. C

NO

25

ERED
O ORD D
T I Honorable FIE
IThe S S
DI Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
AS MO
R NIA

Dated: ____________________

FO

12/19/13

23

T

LI

UNIT
ED

22

DISTRIC
TC

RT
U
O

S

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NOS 13-CV-04568-EMC & 13-CV-04792-EMC