Pinterest, Inc. v. Pintrips, Inc.

Filing 79

ORDER REGARDING 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Discovery Hearing set for 9/4/2014 re 73 MOTION for Protective Order, 57 MOTION for Letter of Request, and 72 Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 08/29/14. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 HARVEY SISKIND LLP LAWRENCE J. SISKIND (SBN 85628) Email: siskind@harveysiskind.com DONALD A. THOMPSON (SBN 260076) Email: dthompson@harveysiskind.com Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 Attorneys for Plaintiff PINTEREST, INC. 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 Case No. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW PINTEREST, INC., a Delaware corporation, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 v. PINTRIPS, INC., a Delaware corporation, STIPULATED REQUEST TO HEAR MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, AND JOINT LETTER ON DESIGNATED HOUSE COUNSEL, ON SHORTENED TIME [PROPOSED] ORDER 18 19 20 Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Pinterest, Inc. (“Pinterest” or “Plaintiff”) 2 and Defendant Pintrips, Inc. (“Pintrips” or “Defendant”), through this Stipulated Request to Hear 3 Motion for Protective Order, Motion for Sanctions, and Joint Letter on Designated House Counsel, 4 on Shortened Time (“Stipulation”), agree as follows: 5 1. Pinterest has noticed a motion pursuant to Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 6 Procedure to issue a Letter of Request for the examination of Mr. Paul Addy by deposition under 7 Article I of the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial 8 Matters. That motion has been set for hearing in this Court at 11:00 am on September 4, 2014. (Dkt. 9 #62) 10 2. Pintrips has noticed a motion for a Protective Order prescribing the manner by which 11 Pinterest may take discovery from certain non-parties as ordered by this Court on August 7, 2014. 12 That motion has been set for hearing in this Court at 11:00 am on October 2, 2014. (Dkt. ## 68 and 13 73) In response to Pintrips’ motion, Pinterest is today filing an Opposition, and a motion for 14 sanctions. 15 accordingly, if the Court grants the parties’ request herein for shortened time, Pintrips requests 16 Tuesday, September 2 (September 1 being Labor Day) as the date by which to file a Reply to 17 Pinterest’s Opposition, and an Opposition to the motion for sanctions. 18 19 20 21 22 3. Pintrips has not yet seen Pinterest’s Opposition, or the motion for sanctions, and The parties have filed a Joint Letter concerning the designation by Pinterest of Anthony Falzone as Designated House Counsel. (Dkt. # 72) 4. Under the Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order, non-expert discovery is to conclude on or before October 3, 2014. (Dkt. # 42) 5. The above referenced motions and Joint Letter all involve disputes over non-expert 23 discovery which the parties hope to resolve as expeditiously as possible, to allow compliance with the 24 Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order. Accordingly, they have stipulated that along with 25 Pinterest’s motion to issue a Letter of Request for the examination of Mr. Paul Addy, which is 26 already scheduled to be heard at 11:00 am on September 4, 2014, Pintrips’ motion for a protective 27 order and Pinterest’s motion for sanctions should also be heard at that same time and date. The 28 -1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW 1 parties also request that the Court permit argument on the parties’ Joint Letter on the designation of 2 Anthony Falzone as Designated House Counsel at that same hearing. 3 4 6. Neither party has previously requested or received a time modification in this case. The time modification presently requested will not have any effect on the schedule for this case. 5 6 Dated: August 27, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 7 HARVEY SISKIND LLP LAWRENCE J. SISKIND DONALD A. THOMPSON 8 9 10 By: _________/s/_______________ Lawrence J. Siskind 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff PINTEREST, INC. 13 14 Dated: August 27, 2014 KENYON & KENYON LLP 15 16 By: _________/s/_______________ Frank L. Bernstein 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant PINTRIPS, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 I, Lawrence J. Siskind, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this document. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1, I hereby attest that counsel for Defendant has concurred in this filing. 24 /s/ 25 26 Lawrence J. Siskind 27 28 -2STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS. 2 The Court will hear the following matters on September 4, 2014: 3 Pinterest's motion for a letter of request, Dkt. No. 57. 4 The parties' joint letter concerning Pinterest's designation of Anthony Falzone as designated 5 house counsel under the parties' stipulated protective order, Dkt. No. 72. 6 Pintrips' motion for a protective order, Dkt. No. 73. 7 Pinterest's motion for sanctions shall be re-noticed for hearing according to Civil Local Rule 8 9 7-2. See Civil L.R. 37-4. The Court will not hear the motion on shortened time. Furthermore, the Court orders the parties to meet and confer to discuss creative solutions for 10 conducting the deposition at issue in Pinterest's motion for a letter of request. To the extent that 11 Pintrips is concerned about the costs of defending such a deposition, the parties shall discuss whether 12 expenses may be minimized by using available technology. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 18 August 29 Dated: ___________, 2014 _______________________________________________ THE HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?