Pinterest, Inc. v. Pintrips, Inc.
Filing
79
ORDER REGARDING 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Discovery Hearing set for 9/4/2014 re 73 MOTION for Protective Order, 57 MOTION for Letter of Request, and 72 Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 08/29/14. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HARVEY SISKIND LLP
LAWRENCE J. SISKIND (SBN 85628)
Email: siskind@harveysiskind.com
DONALD A. THOMPSON (SBN 260076)
Email: dthompson@harveysiskind.com
Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 354-0100
Facsimile: (415) 391-7124
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PINTEREST, INC.
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
Case No. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW
PINTEREST, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
v.
PINTRIPS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,
STIPULATED REQUEST TO HEAR
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER,
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, AND JOINT
LETTER ON DESIGNATED HOUSE
COUNSEL, ON SHORTENED TIME
[PROPOSED] ORDER
18
19
20
Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Pinterest, Inc. (“Pinterest” or “Plaintiff”)
2
and Defendant Pintrips, Inc. (“Pintrips” or “Defendant”), through this Stipulated Request to Hear
3
Motion for Protective Order, Motion for Sanctions, and Joint Letter on Designated House Counsel,
4
on Shortened Time (“Stipulation”), agree as follows:
5
1.
Pinterest has noticed a motion pursuant to Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
6
Procedure to issue a Letter of Request for the examination of Mr. Paul Addy by deposition under
7
Article I of the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial
8
Matters. That motion has been set for hearing in this Court at 11:00 am on September 4, 2014. (Dkt.
9
#62)
10
2.
Pintrips has noticed a motion for a Protective Order prescribing the manner by which
11
Pinterest may take discovery from certain non-parties as ordered by this Court on August 7, 2014.
12
That motion has been set for hearing in this Court at 11:00 am on October 2, 2014. (Dkt. ## 68 and
13
73) In response to Pintrips’ motion, Pinterest is today filing an Opposition, and a motion for
14
sanctions.
15
accordingly, if the Court grants the parties’ request herein for shortened time, Pintrips requests
16
Tuesday, September 2 (September 1 being Labor Day) as the date by which to file a Reply to
17
Pinterest’s Opposition, and an Opposition to the motion for sanctions.
18
19
20
21
22
3.
Pintrips has not yet seen Pinterest’s Opposition, or the motion for sanctions, and
The parties have filed a Joint Letter concerning the designation by Pinterest of
Anthony Falzone as Designated House Counsel. (Dkt. # 72)
4.
Under the Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order, non-expert discovery is to
conclude on or before October 3, 2014. (Dkt. # 42)
5.
The above referenced motions and Joint Letter all involve disputes over non-expert
23
discovery which the parties hope to resolve as expeditiously as possible, to allow compliance with the
24
Court’s Case Management Scheduling Order. Accordingly, they have stipulated that along with
25
Pinterest’s motion to issue a Letter of Request for the examination of Mr. Paul Addy, which is
26
already scheduled to be heard at 11:00 am on September 4, 2014, Pintrips’ motion for a protective
27
order and Pinterest’s motion for sanctions should also be heard at that same time and date. The
28
-1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW
1
parties also request that the Court permit argument on the parties’ Joint Letter on the designation of
2
Anthony Falzone as Designated House Counsel at that same hearing.
3
4
6.
Neither party has previously requested or received a time modification in this case.
The time modification presently requested will not have any effect on the schedule for this case.
5
6
Dated: August 27, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
7
HARVEY SISKIND LLP
LAWRENCE J. SISKIND
DONALD A. THOMPSON
8
9
10
By: _________/s/_______________
Lawrence J. Siskind
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PINTEREST, INC.
13
14
Dated: August 27, 2014
KENYON & KENYON LLP
15
16
By: _________/s/_______________
Frank L. Bernstein
17
18
Attorneys for Defendant
PINTRIPS, INC.
19
20
21
22
23
I, Lawrence J. Siskind, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
file this document. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1, I hereby attest that counsel for Defendant has
concurred in this filing.
24
/s/
25
26
Lawrence J. Siskind
27
28
-2STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS.
2
The Court will hear the following matters on September 4, 2014:
3
Pinterest's motion for a letter of request, Dkt. No. 57.
4
The parties' joint letter concerning Pinterest's designation of Anthony Falzone as designated
5
house counsel under the parties' stipulated protective order, Dkt. No. 72.
6
Pintrips' motion for a protective order, Dkt. No. 73.
7
Pinterest's motion for sanctions shall be re-noticed for hearing according to Civil Local Rule
8
9
7-2. See Civil L.R. 37-4. The Court will not hear the motion on shortened time.
Furthermore, the Court orders the parties to meet and confer to discuss creative solutions for
10
conducting the deposition at issue in Pinterest's motion for a letter of request. To the extent that
11
Pintrips is concerned about the costs of defending such a deposition, the parties shall discuss whether
12
expenses may be minimized by using available technology.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
18
August 29
Dated: ___________, 2014
_______________________________________________
THE HONORABLE KANDIS A. WESTMORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
CASE NO. CV 13-04608-RS-KAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?