Jimenez et al v. County of Alameda

Filing 45

ORDER granting 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Dennis Jimenez, Jr., et al. Reset Deadlines as to 35 MOT ION for Partial Summary Judgment . Motion Hearing and Further Case Management Conference reset for 9/18/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Supplemental Case Management Statement due by 9/11/2015.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/3/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888 BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq., SBN 222173 THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 John.Burris@johnburrislaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 LEILANI JIMENEZ, individually, and as successor-in-interest for Decedent DENNIS JIMENEZ; J.J., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Leilani Jimenez; D.J., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Leilani Jimenez, and DENNIS JIMENEZ, Jr. an individual, Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal corporation and DOES 1-50, individually, inclusive; Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 13-04620 CRB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT STIPULATION WHEREAS, Defendants in the above-entitled action filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in this action to be heard by the Court on August 14, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 27 28 Jimenez v. County of Alameda, et al Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Further CMC and Hearing on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 1 1 WHEREAS, the Court continued on its own motion to August 14, 2015 2 at 10:00 a.m. a Further Case Management Conference in this matter which had 3 been scheduled to be held on July 20, 2015. 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel in this action, Ben Nisenbaum, has 5 a longstanding scheduled family vacation to Mexico from August 12-August 19, 6 2015 with counsel’s in-laws. 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Ben Nisenbaum, is the best 8 equipped and prepared lawyer in this case in Plaintiffs’ counsel’s office to 9 argue against Defendants’ Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. 10 11 12 13 14 WHEREFORE, The parties stipulate that the Case Management Conference and hearing on Defendants’ Partial Motion for Summary Judgment be continued by two weeks to August 28, 2015 at 10:00, when counsel for all parties are mutually available. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 17 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Dated: August 3, 2015 By: /s/Benjamin Nisenbaum Ben Nisenbaum Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: July 22, 2015 BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE 18 19 20 21 By: /s/Gregory J. Rockwell Gregory J. Rockwell, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jimenez v. County of Alameda, et al Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Further CMC and Hearing on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 2 1 ORDER 2 3 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, good cause shown, the 4 Further Case Management Conference and hearing on Defendant Motion for Partial 5 Summary Judgment is continued to September 18, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 3, 2015 ___________________________ Honorable Charles R. Breyer UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jimenez v. County of Alameda, et al Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Further CMC and Hearing on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?