Jimenez et al v. County of Alameda
Filing
45
ORDER granting 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Dennis Jimenez, Jr., et al. Reset Deadlines as to 35 MOT ION for Partial Summary Judgment . Motion Hearing and Further Case Management Conference reset for 9/18/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Supplemental Case Management Statement due by 9/11/2015.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/3/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN 69888
BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq., SBN 222173
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Center
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
John.Burris@johnburrislaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
LEILANI JIMENEZ, individually, and as
successor-in-interest for Decedent DENNIS
JIMENEZ; J.J., a minor, by and through his
guardian ad litem Leilani Jimenez; D.J., a
minor, by and through her guardian ad litem
Leilani Jimenez, and DENNIS JIMENEZ, Jr.
an individual,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
v.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a municipal
corporation and DOES 1-50, individually,
inclusive;
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 13-04620 CRB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Defendants in the above-entitled action filed a Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment in this action to be heard by the Court on August 14,
2015 at 10:00 a.m.
27
28
Jimenez v. County of Alameda, et al
Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Further CMC and Hearing on
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
1
1
WHEREAS, the Court continued on its own motion to August 14, 2015
2
at 10:00 a.m. a Further Case Management Conference in this matter which had
3
been scheduled to be held on July 20, 2015.
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel in this action, Ben Nisenbaum, has
5
a longstanding scheduled family vacation to Mexico from August 12-August 19,
6
2015 with counsel’s in-laws.
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Ben Nisenbaum, is the best
8
equipped and prepared lawyer in this case in Plaintiffs’ counsel’s office to
9
argue against Defendants’ Partial Motion for Summary Judgment.
10
11
12
13
14
WHEREFORE, The parties stipulate that the Case Management
Conference and hearing on Defendants’ Partial Motion for Summary Judgment
be continued by two weeks to August 28, 2015 at 10:00, when counsel for all
parties are mutually available.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
17
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Dated: August 3, 2015
By: /s/Benjamin Nisenbaum
Ben Nisenbaum
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: July 22, 2015
BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
18
19
20
21
By: /s/Gregory J. Rockwell
Gregory J. Rockwell, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jimenez v. County of Alameda, et al
Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Further CMC and Hearing on
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
2
1
ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, good cause shown, the
4
Further Case Management Conference and hearing on Defendant Motion for Partial
5
Summary Judgment is continued to September 18, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 3, 2015
___________________________
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jimenez v. County of Alameda, et al
Stipulation and Proposed Order Continuing Further CMC and Hearing on
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?