ASAP Copy and Print v. Brown et al
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AND MODIFIED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 56 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/27/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
No. C 13-04621 SI
ASAP COPY AND PRINT, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF
TIME AND MODIFIED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
Plaintiffs,
v.
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
17
On October 4, 2013, plaintiffs filed their complaint against multiple defendants. Docket No. 1.
18
On February 13, 2014, defendant, the County of Los Angeles, filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the
19
motion for a hearing on March 21, 2014. Docket No. 37. The response date for this motion was set for
20
February 27, 2014. Id. Defendants Benavidez, Clarke, Boren, Carter, Casados, Chaparyan, Bland,
21
Fischer, Ghobrial, Kuhle, Lane, McCullough, McGuire, Mitchell, Scheper, Sortino and the Superior
22
Court of the County of Los Angeles filed motions to dismiss and to change venue, and noticed the
23
motions for hearing on March 21, 2014. Docket Nos. 39, 40. The response date for these hearings was
24
erroneously set for April 4, 2014. Id. Defendant General Electric Corp. also filed a motion to dismiss
25
on February 13, 2014, and noticed the motion for hearing on April 4, 2014. Docket No. 42. The
26
response date for this motion was set for February 27, 2014. Id. On February 14, 2014, defendants
27
Jerry Brown and Kamala Harris filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the motion for hearing on April
28
4, 2014. Docket No. 44. Responses for this motion were set for February 28, 2014. Id. Defendant
1
Canon Business Solutions, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss on February 19, 2014, and noticed the motion
2
for hearing on April 4, 2014. Docket No. 47. The response date for this motion was set for March 21,
3
2014. Id. Also on February 19, 2014, defendant Canon Financial Services, Inc. filed a motion to
4
dismiss and noticed the motion for hearing on April 4, 2014. Docket No. 49. The response date for this
5
motion was set for March 5, 2014. Id.
6
On February 21, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for extension of time to file responses and replies
7
and/or for modified briefing schedule. Docket No. 56. Defendant Canon Financial Services, Inc.
8
responded in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion the same day. Docket No. 57.
Plaintiffs request that all hearings scheduled for March 21, 2014 and April 4, 2014 be
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
rescheduled for May 9, 2014, and that a single briefing schedule be established. The Court finds that
11
plaintiffs have shown good cause for an extension and GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion.
12
The Court sets the following schedule for all of defendants’ motions:
13
Plaintiffs’ opposition briefs: April 4, 2014
14
Defendants’ reply briefs:
April 18, 2014
15
Hearing:
May 9, 2014, 9:00 a.m.
16
The Court does not contemplate granting any further extensions of time on these motions.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: February 27, 2014
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?