ASAP Copy and Print v. Brown et al

Filing 59

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AND MODIFIED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE 56 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/27/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

No. C 13-04621 SI

ASAP COPY AND PRINT, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF
TIME AND MODIFIED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Plaintiffs,
v.
JERRY BROWN, et al.,
Defendants.

/

16
17

On October 4, 2013, plaintiffs filed their complaint against multiple defendants. Docket No. 1.

18

On February 13, 2014, defendant, the County of Los Angeles, filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the

19

motion for a hearing on March 21, 2014. Docket No. 37. The response date for this motion was set for

20

February 27, 2014. Id. Defendants Benavidez, Clarke, Boren, Carter, Casados, Chaparyan, Bland,

21

Fischer, Ghobrial, Kuhle, Lane, McCullough, McGuire, Mitchell, Scheper, Sortino and the Superior

22

Court of the County of Los Angeles filed motions to dismiss and to change venue, and noticed the

23

motions for hearing on March 21, 2014. Docket Nos. 39, 40. The response date for these hearings was

24

erroneously set for April 4, 2014. Id. Defendant General Electric Corp. also filed a motion to dismiss

25

on February 13, 2014, and noticed the motion for hearing on April 4, 2014. Docket No. 42. The

26

response date for this motion was set for February 27, 2014. Id. On February 14, 2014, defendants

27

Jerry Brown and Kamala Harris filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the motion for hearing on April

28

4, 2014. Docket No. 44. Responses for this motion were set for February 28, 2014. Id. Defendant

1

Canon Business Solutions, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss on February 19, 2014, and noticed the motion

2

for hearing on April 4, 2014. Docket No. 47. The response date for this motion was set for March 21,

3

2014. Id. Also on February 19, 2014, defendant Canon Financial Services, Inc. filed a motion to

4

dismiss and noticed the motion for hearing on April 4, 2014. Docket No. 49. The response date for this

5

motion was set for March 5, 2014. Id.

6

On February 21, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for extension of time to file responses and replies

7

and/or for modified briefing schedule. Docket No. 56. Defendant Canon Financial Services, Inc.

8

responded in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion the same day. Docket No. 57.
Plaintiffs request that all hearings scheduled for March 21, 2014 and April 4, 2014 be

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

9

rescheduled for May 9, 2014, and that a single briefing schedule be established. The Court finds that

11

plaintiffs have shown good cause for an extension and GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion.

12

The Court sets the following schedule for all of defendants’ motions:

13

Plaintiffs’ opposition briefs: April 4, 2014

14

Defendants’ reply briefs:

April 18, 2014

15

Hearing:

May 9, 2014, 9:00 a.m.

16

The Court does not contemplate granting any further extensions of time on these motions.

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

Dated: February 27, 2014
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2