Prater v. Macy Corp San Mateo

Filing 35

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

CHRISTOPHER KYLE PRATER,

No. C 13-4637 MMC

Plaintiff,

12

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
13
MACY CORP SAN MATEO,
14
Defendant.
15

/

16
17
18

The court-appointed ENE Evaluator having advised the Court that the parties have
agreed to a settlement of this cause,

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims alleged against defendants herein

20

be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to

21

this Court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on the opposing

22

party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, the

23

foregoing order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the

24

calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 30, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge