Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 155

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 154 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS filed by Aylus Networks, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/17/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
2 Harold A. Barza (Bar No. 80888)
[e-mail]
3 Amar L. Thakur (Bar No. 194025)
[e-mail]
4 Vincent Pollmeier (Bar No. 210684)
[e-mail]
5 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
6 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
7
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
8 SULLIVAN, LLP
William O. Cooper (Bar No. 279385)
9 [e-mail]
Joseph B. Martin (Bar No. 284156)
10 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
11 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile:
[phone]

MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. 124235
[e-mail]
CHRISTINE K. CORBETT, Bar No. 209128
[e-mail]
ROBERT BUERGI, Bar No. 242910
[e-mail]
ERIK R. FUEHRER, Bar No. 252578
[e-mail]
JONATHAN HICKS, Bar No. 274634
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.833.2001

13 Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Aylus Networks, Inc.
14

Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

ROBERT WILLIAMS, Bar No. 246990
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101-4297
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19 Aylus Networks, Inc.,
20
21

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-4700-EMC

Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING AUTHENTICITY
OF DOCUMENTS

vs.

22 Apple Inc.
23

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
05010-00001/6544332.2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

1

WHEREAS, Aylus Networks, Inc. (“Aylus”) commenced the above-captioned action (the

2 “Litigation”) against Apple Inc. (“Apple,” and together with Aylus, “the Parties,” and individually
3
4

each a “Party”) on October 9, 2013;
WHEREAS, the Parties subsequently have produced thousands of pages of documents in

5
6
7

connection with discovery in the Litigation; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that it is in their mutual interest to avoid the

8 significant and unnecessary burden and expense associated with the document-by-document
9 authentication of documents, and that stipulating to the authenticity of certain documents will
10 promote the orderly and efficient progress of the Litigation.
11

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties as

12
follows:
13
14

1.

Absent affirmative evidence that a document or thing is not what it purports to be,

15 the Parties agree that documents produced by either Apple or Aylus in the Litigation will be
16 presumed authentic for purposes of Rule 901 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
17

2.

The Parties agree that, absent affirmative evidence to the contrary, documents

18 produced from the records of either Party are presumptively business records for purposes of Rule
19

902(11).

20
3.

Nothing in this stipulation shall be construed as an agreement that any documents

21
22

or things that are subject to this stipulation are admissible into evidence by any Party, except as

23 expressly addressed herein. The Parties hereby expressly reserve the right to object to the
24 admissibility of any document or thing under any grounds permitted by law and not expressly
25 addressed herein.
26
27
28
05010-00001/6544332.2

-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

1 Dated: July 17, 2015
2
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
3 SULLIVAN, LLP

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

4 /s/ Amar L. Thakur
5 Harold A. Barza
Amar L. Thakur
6 Vincent Pollmeier

/s/ Christine K. Corbett
MARK D. FOWLER
CHRISTINE K. CORBETT
ROBERT BUERGI
ROBERT WILLIAMS
ERIK R. FUEHRER
JONATHAN HICKS

7 Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Aylus Networks, Inc.
8
9

Attorneys for Defendant,
Apple Inc.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
05010-00001/6544332.2

-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

1
2

ATTESTATION CLAUSE
I, Joseph B. Martin, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to

3 file this Stipulated Protective Order. In compliance with Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that
4 Christine K. Corbett and Amar L. Thakur have concurred in this filing.
5
6 Dated: July 17, 2015

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

7
8
9
10
11

By: /s/ Joseph B. Martin
Joseph B. Martin
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Aylus Networks, Inc

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
05010-00001/6544332.2

-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S
By:

R NIA

7/17/15

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud

6

H

ER

LI

RT

8
9

FO

NO

7

A

5 Dated:

UNIT
ED

4

RT
U
O

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
05010-00001/6544332.2

-4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE AUTHENTICITY OF DOCUMENTS