Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 189

ORDER re 178 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Aylus Networks, Inc., 177 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Apple Inc. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/21/2015. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AYLUS NETWORKS, INC., Case No. 13-cv-04700-EMC (KAW) Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEFS 9 10 APPLE INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 177, 178 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The parties to this case have filed two joint discovery letters. In one letter, Apple asks that 13 the Court strike the supplemental report of Aylus' expert, Dan Schonfeld. (Joint Ltr., Dkt. No. 14 177.) The parties reference certain exhibits in the letter but did not attach them based on their 15 reading of this Court's Standing Order. (Id. at 1 n.1.) The parties are ordered to file Mr. 16 Schonfeld's opening report, his supplemental report, and any other exhibits that are referenced in, 17 but not attached to, the joint letter by no later than October 23, 2015. They shall also provide 18 courtesy chambers copies. 19 In the second joint letter, Aylus seeks to strike a section of the report of Apple's technical 20 expert, Nathaniel Polish. (Joint Ltr., Dkt. No. 178.) Similarly, the parties did not attach a copy of 21 the report and certain other exhibits referenced in the letter. The parties are ordered to file a copy 22 of the report, and any other unattached exhibits, by no later than October 23, 2015. They shall 23 also provide a courtesy copy of the exhibits and the joint letter, which the Court has not yet 24 received. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/21/2015 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?