Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 re 34 Stipulation and Order, Terminate Deadlines. Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings 31 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Aylus's First Amended Complaint for Failure to Stat filed by Aylus Networks, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/5/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 2 Harold A. Barza (Bar No. 80888) halbarza@quinnemanuel.com 3 Amar L. Thakur (Bar No. 194025) amarthakur@quinnemanuel.com 4 Vincent Pollmeier (Bar No. 210684) vincentpollmeier@quinnemanuel.com 5 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor 6 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 7 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 8 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 9 SULLIVAN, LLP William O. Cooper (Bar No. 279385) willcooper@quinnemanuel.com 10 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 11 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 (415) 875-6700 12 Facsimile: 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Aylus Networks, Inc. 14 MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. 124235 mark.fowler@dlapiper.com CHRISTINE K. CORBETT, Bar No. 209128 christine.corbett@dlapiper.com ROBERT BUERGI, Bar No. 242910 robert.buergi@dlapiper.com ERIK R. FUEHRER, Bar No. 252578 erik.fuehrer@dlapiper.com JONATHAN HICKS, Bar No. 274634 jonathan.hicks@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 Telephone: 650.833.2000 Facsimile: 650.833.2001 ROBERT WILLIAMS, Bar No. 246990 robert.williams@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101-4297 Telephone: (619) 699-2700 Facsimile: (619) 699-2701 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 AYLUS NETWORKS, INC., a Delaware 22 corporation, 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 APPLE INC., a California corporation 26 CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04700-EMC STIPULATION FOR APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Hearing Date: March 27, 2014 Time: 1:30 p.m. Judge: Edward M. Chen Courtroom: 5, 17th floor Defendant. 27 28 05010.00001/5793347.2 Case No. 3:13-cv-04700-EMC STIPULATION FOR APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, on January 27, 2014, Plaintiff Aylus Networks, Inc. (“Aylus”) filed a First 2 Amended Complaint; 3 WHEREAS, on February 13, 2014, Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), filed a Notice of 4 Motion And Motion To Dismiss Aylus's First Amended Complaint For Failure To State A Claim, 5 Or, In The Alternative, Motion For A More Definite Statement, with a hearing date set for March 6 20, 2014 before Judge Chen; 7 WHEREAS, on February 27, 2014 Aylus and Apple stipulated that (1) Aylus’ Opposition 8 to Apple’s Motion would be due on March 6, 2014; (2) Apple’s Reply to Aylus’s Opposition 9 would be due on March 13, 2014; and (3) the hearing for Apple’s motion in front of Judge Chen, 10 would be on March 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM; 11 WHEREAS, Aylus and Apple have met and conferred to resolve the matter in good faith 12 and not burden the Court with unnecessary hearings; 13 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties that: 14 1. Aylus will file a Second Amended Complaint. The only changes to the existing 15 complaint will be to drop the willfulness allegations, namely paragraph 26 and Prayer for Relief 4 16 of the First Amended Complaint. 17 2. Aylus will file the Second Amended Complaint no later than Monday, March 10, 2014. 18 Upon such filing, Apple will withdraw its Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; and 19 the hearing date for such motion, scheduled for March 27, 2014, will be taken off calendar. 20 3. Aylus intends to seek reasonable discovery regarding willfulness. Apple agrees that it 21 will not object on the grounds of relevance to Aylus’ discovery directed to (1) Mr. Rob Orgel’s 22 alleged pre-suit knowledge of the patent-in-suit and (2) any alleged Apple monitoring of the 23 issuance of patents in the field of U.S. Patent No. RE44,412 (“the ’753/412 patent”) that allegedly 24 resulted in Apple’s alleged identification of the ’753/412 patent. Apple reserves the right to object 25 to any additional discovery on the grounds of relevance in addition to any other non-relevance 26 objections. 27 28 05010.00001/5793347.2 -1Case No. 3:13-cv-04700-EMC STIPULATION FOR APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 2 DATED: March 4, 2014 3 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & 4 SULLIVAN, LLP 5 /s/ Amar L. Thakur 6 Harold A. Barza Amar L. Thakur 7 Vincent Pollmeier 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Aylus Networks, Inc. 9 10 DLA PIPER LLP (US) /s/ Mark D. Fowler MARK D. FOWLER CHRISTINE K. CORBETT ROBERT BUERGI ROBERT WILLIAMS ERIK R. FUEHRER JONATHAN HICKS Attorneys for Defendant, Apple Inc. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 05010.00001/5793347.2 -2Case No. 3:13-cv-04700-EMC STIPULATION FOR APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NO RT 5 ER 7 A H 6 Edward M. Chen United States District Judge hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud R NIA 4 LI By: TED GRAN FO S 3 Dated: 3/5/14 UNIT ED 2 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C A 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. T N F D IS T IC T O R C 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 05010.00001/5793347.2 -3Case No. 3:13-cv-04700-EMC STIPULATION FOR APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?