Strub v. YouTube LLC

Filing 57

STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/4/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Glenn F. Ostrager
(admitted pro hac vice) NY S.B.N. 1508456
[e-mail]
Joshua S. Broitman
(admitted pro hac vice) NY S.B.N. 2583227
[e-mail]
OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY
& BROITMAN P.C.
570 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11

Robert C. Schubert S.B.N. 62684
[e-mail]
Willem F. Jonckheer S.B.N. 178748
[e-mail]
SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Adam Botzenhart (Bar No. 282108)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants, YouTube, LLC and
Google Inc.

12
Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Strub
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17

DANIEL STRUB,

18

Case No. C 13-04704 RS
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AMENDING CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

19

v.

20

YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE INC.,

21

Defendants.

22
23
24

WHEREAS, on January 23, 2014, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling
Order (Dkt. 46);

25
26
27
28

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2014, Daniel Strub (“Strub”) filed a First Amended
Complaint which added Google Inc. as a party defendant (Dkt. 47);
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2014, defendants YouTube, Inc. and Google Inc. filed an
Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. 13-cv-04704-RS

1

Answer to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 52); and

2
3

WHEREAS, the parties are agreeable to adhering to the deadlines fixed by the Court in
the Case Management Scheduling Order;

4

THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties stipulate as follows:

5
The deadlines set in the Case Management Scheduling Order shall apply to newly added

6
7

party Google Inc. Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per

8

side, limited to seven (7) hours per individual deposition; (b) seven (7) hours of deposition

9

testimony of each adverse expert for each report provided, extended to fourteen (14) hours if any

10
11

single expert provides a report related to both infringement and validity; (c) twenty-five (25)
interrogatories per side, including all discrete subparts; (d) a reasonable number of requests for

12
13
14
15
16

production of documents or for inspection per side; and (e) thirty (30) requests for admission per
side.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED: ____________, 2014
4/4

17

________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21

Dated: April 4, 2014

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
Robert C. Schubert
Willem F. Jonckheer

22
23

OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY
&
BROITMAN P.C.

24
25
26
27
28

By: /s/ Glenn F. Ostrager
Glenn F. Ostrager
Joshua S. Broitman
570 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
-2-

Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. C 13-04704 RS

1

Facsimile: [phone]

2

Attorneys for Plaintiff

3
4

Dated: April 4, 2014

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

By: /s/ Adam Botzenhart
Melissa J. Baily
Adam Botzenhart
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants YouTube, LLC
and Google Inc.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. C 13-04704 RS