Strub v. YouTube LLC

Filing 60

STIPULATION AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Markman hearing set for 9/5/2014 10:00 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 9/5/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/10/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014)

Case3:13-cv-04704-RS Document59 Filed06/09/14 Page1 of 4

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

3
4
5
6
7
8

DANIEL STRUB,

Case No. C 13-04704 RS
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AMENDING CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

v.
YOUTUBE, LLC and GOOGLE INC.,
Defendants.

9
10
11

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Daniel Strub and Defendants YouTube, LLC and

12

Google Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record,

13

stipulate as recited below and jointly request that the Court amend the current case management

14

schedule as set forth below.

15
16
17
18
19
20

WHEREAS, on January 23, 2014, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling
Order (Dkt. 46);
WHEREAS, on April 4, 2014, this Court entered a Stipulation and Order Amending Case
Management Scheduling (Dkt. 57);
WHEREAS, the parties agreed to extend the deadline to exchange Patent Local Rule 4-1

21

Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence (“Preliminary Claim Constructions”) to

22

May 23, 2014;

23
24
25
26

WHEREAS, on May 22, 2014, Plaintiff informed Defendants of its intention to serve a
proposed amended Patent Local Rule 3-1 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
Contentions (“Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions”) and the parties agreed to further

27

extend the deadline to exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions until after service of Plaintiff’s

28

Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions;
01980.52146/6053064.1

Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. 13-cv-04704-RS

Case3:13-cv-04704-RS Document59 Filed06/09/14 Page2 of 4

1
2

WHEREAS, on May 30, 2014, Plaintiff served its Proposed Amended Infringement
Contentions;

3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that Plaintiff’s Proposed Amended Infringement
Contentions are baseless and, among other things, fail to comply with the specificity requirements
of Patent Local Rule 3-1; and

7

WHEREAS, Plaintiff disputes Defendants’ characterization, but has agreed, without

8

prejudice, to provide further specificity in its Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions;

9
10
11
12
13

THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s approval, the Parties stipulate that the deadlines set
in the Case Management Scheduling Order should be amended as follows:
6/23/14

Plaintiff to serve revised Proposed Amended Infringement Contentions.

7/7/14

Parties to exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions pursuant to Pat.
L.R. 4-2.
Parties to file Joint Claim Construction & Prehearing Statement
pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-3.
Claim Construction Discovery Cut-Off pursuant to Pat. L.R. 4-4.

14

7/21/14

15

8/4/14

16

8/4/14

17
18
19
20

Strub to file Opening Brief on Claim Construction pursuant to Patent
L.R. 4-5(a).
8/18/14
YouTube to file Responsive Brief on Claim Construction pursuant to
Patent L.R. 4-5(b).
8/25/14
Strub to file Reply Brief on Claim Construction pursuant to Patent L.R.
4-5(c).
Friday, 9/5/14 at 10:00 Tutorial and Markman hearing.
a.m.

21
22
23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED: ____________, 2014
6/10

27

______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

28
01980.52146/6053064.1

-2-

Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. C 13-04704 RS

Case3:13-cv-04704-RS Document59 Filed06/09/14 Page3 of 4

1
2

Dated: June 9, 2014

3
4
5

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP
Robert C. Schubert
Willem F. Jonckheer
OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY
&
BROITMAN P.C.

6
7

11

By: /s/ Glenn F. Ostrager
Glenn F. Ostrager
Joshua S. Broitman
570 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff

8
9
10

13
14

Dated: June 9, 2014

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP

15
16

By: /s/ Adam Botzenhart________
Melissa J. Baily
Adam Botzenhart
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Defendants YouTube, LLC
and Google Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
01980.52146/6053064.1

-3-

Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. C 13-04704 RS

Case3:13-cv-04704-RS Document59 Filed06/09/14 Page4 of 4

1
2

ATTESTATION
I, Glenn F. Ostrager, am the ECF User whose ID and password being used to file this

3

Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45,X.B., I hereby attest under penalty of perjury

4

that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

5
6

Dated: June 9, 2014

7
8

/s/ Glenn F. Ostrager
Glenn F. Ostrager

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
01980.52146/6053064.1

-4-

Stipulation Amending Case Management Order
Case No. C 13-04704 RS