Gieseke et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 18

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARINGS re 7 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by U.S. Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A.; 8 MOTION to Expunge Lis Pendens; Attorneys' Fees filed by U.S. Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A.; 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint filed by Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 18, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOROTHY C. GIESEKE, et al., Case No. 13-cv-04772-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARINGS 9 10 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al., Re: ECF Nos. 7, 8 & 10 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss and a motion to expunge a lis pendens. ECF 14 Nos. 7, 8, 10. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the 15 Court finds that the parties’ briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matters 16 suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearings on these motions, currently 17 scheduled for January 2 and January 9, are hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should reflect the date or dates 23 on which the parties are available for the hearing. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2013 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?