Edwards v. Jonas et al
Order by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK THOMAS EDWARDS,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
PATRICIA JONAS, et al.
ORDER RE MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
No. C 13-04788 WHA
Pro se plaintiff moves for an extension of time to file a motion. This order, however, is
unclear about what motion plaintiff seeks to file. At the current stage of this social security
appeal, plaintiff does not need to file any motions; defendants must file an answer to plaintiff’s
complaint within 90 days of receipt of service of the summons and complaint. 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
Thus, plaintiff’s motion to enlarge time is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 14, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?