Edwards v. Jonas et al

Filing 20

Order by Hon. William Alsup finding as moot 18 Motion for Extension of Time to File.(whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/14/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MARK THOMAS EDWARDS, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA JONAS, et al. ORDER RE MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 13-04788 WHA Pro se plaintiff moves for an extension of time to file a motion. This order, however, is 17 unclear about what motion plaintiff seeks to file. At the current stage of this social security 18 appeal, plaintiff does not need to file any motions; defendants must file an answer to plaintiff’s 19 complaint within 90 days of receipt of service of the summons and complaint. 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 20 Thus, plaintiff’s motion to enlarge time is DENIED AS MOOT. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 14, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?