Torres v. Annabel Investment Company

Filing 11

ORDER RE JURISDICTION AND 10 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/7/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JESUS TORRES,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,

No. C 13-04798 WHA

v.

13

ANNABEL INVESTMENT COMPANY,

14

Defendant.
/

15
16

ORDER RE JURISDICTION AND
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

The parties have stipulated to dismiss this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of

17

Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) (Dkt. No. 10). In doing so, the parties request that the undersigned

18

judge retain jurisdiction over this action for 18 months, because “[s]ome parts of the Settlement

19

Agreement are to be performed in the future.”

20

Before dismissal may be approved, however, the parties will please lodge a copy of their

21

settlement agreement for review, by 12 PM ON APRIL 11, 2014. Please note that jurisdiction

22

typically is retained for only ninety days when parties stipulate to dismissal, as is the case here.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: April 7, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE