Mahan v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America

Filing 123

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 122 Stipulation to Continue the Hearing of Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and Related Deadlines.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. Anna M. Martin – CSBN 154279 amartin@rimacmartin.com William Reilly – CSBN 177550 wreilly@rimacmartin.com 1051 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Telephone: 415.561-8440 Facsimile: 415.561-8430 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA Samuel F. Barnum LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL F. BARNUM 4302 Redwood Highway, Suite 100 San Rafael, CA 94903 Tel: 415.492.9800 Fax: 415.492.9808 Attorneys for Plaintiff NANCY MAHAN 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NANCY MAHAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. 3:13-cv-04803 VC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINE THE HEARING OF CROSSMOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED DEADLINES Plaintiff, Nancy Mahan and Defendant, Unum Life Insurance Company of America by and through their counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows: 1 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINE THE DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED DEADLINES 28 Case No. 3:13-cv-04803 VC On October 14, 2014, this Court granted the parties Stipulation and Order to continue the 1 2 Deadline to Complete the Mandatory Settlement Conference and to Continue the Dates for the 3 Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and set the following briefing schedule: 4 Plaintiff’s opening brief in support of her motion for summary judgment will be filed on or before March 12, 2015; Defendant’s opening cross-motion and opposition brief will be filed on or before March 26, 2015; Plaintiff’s reply and opposition brief will be filed on or before April 9, 2015; Defendant’s reply brief will be filed on or before April 16, 2015; and The cross-motions will be heard on April 30, 2015. 5 6 7 8 On October 27, 2014 and twice on December 23, 2014 the parties filed stipulations and 9 10 orders modifying the discovery cut-off and the settlement conference schedule, all of which were 11 entered as Orders. 12 13 14 On March 13, 2014, defendant’s counsel reviewed the Orders and mistakenly determined that defendant’s opposition brief was due to be filed on or before April 9, 2015. Upon checking the Docket on March 25, 2015, defendant’s counsel realized his mistake and immediately called 15 16 plaintiff’s counsel who courteously agreed to continue all of the dates. 17 As such, the parties stipulate to continue the briefing schedule as follows: 18 Defendant’s opening cross-motion and opposition brief will be filed on or before April 9, 19 20 21 2015; Plaintiff’s reply and opposition brief will be filed on or before April 23, 2015; Defendant’s reply brief will be filed on or before April 30, 2015; and 22 The cross-motions will be heard on May 14, 2015. 23 24 25 26 2 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINE THE DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED DEADLINES 28 Case No. 3:13-cv-04803 VC 1 GOOD CASUE EXISTS for this brief continuance due to defendant’s counsel’s mistake, 2 inadvertence or excusable neglect. 3 SO STIPULATED. 4 5 RIMAC MARTIN, P.C. DATED: March 25, 2015 6 7 8 By: /s/ William Reilly WILLIAM REILLY Attorneys for Defendant UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA 9 LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL F. BARNUM 10 11 DATED: March 25, 2014 12 13 By: /s/ Samuel F. Barnum SAMUEL F. BARNUM Attorneys for Plaintiff NANCY MAHAN 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: March 26, 2015 18 HON. VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINE THE DATE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED DEADLINES 28 Case No. 3:13-cv-04803 VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?