Anderson v. Duran et al

Filing 197

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/22/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

10
11
Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP
1800 East Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

JOHN P. ANDERSON, in his official capacity as the ) CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04825-RS
)
Sheriff of Madera County, and individually,
) [Action filed: 10-17-13
) Assigned to: Hon. Richard Seeborg
Plaintiff,
) Dept: Courtroom 3]
)
v.

)
)
JACK DURAN, JR., in his purported official capacity )
as Judge of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi )
Indians Tribal Court;
)
DONNA HOWARD, in her purported official capacity )
as Clerk of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi )
)
Indians Tribal Court;
)
THE PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE
)
CHUKCHANSI INDIANS, a federally recognized
)
Indian Tribe;
)
CHUKCHANSI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
)
AUTHORITY, a wholly owned unincorporated entity )
of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians; )
CHUKCHANSI INDIAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, )
a wholly owned unincorporated entity of the Picayune )
Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians;
)
)
)
)
)

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
MOTIONS PENDING BEFORE THIS
COURT

25
26
27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:13-cv-04825-RS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

10
11
Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP
1800 East Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

REGGIE LEWIS, in his purported official capacities )
)
as chairman of the Picayune Rancheria of the
)
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
)
CHANCE ALBERTA, in his purported official
)
capacities as vice chairman of the Picayune Rancheria )
of the Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
)
Authority;
CARL BUSHMAN, in his purported official capacities )
as a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the )
)
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
)
IRENE WALTZ, in her purported official capacities as )
a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the )
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
LYNN CHENOT, in her purported official capacities )
as a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the )
)
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
)
DAVID CASTILLO, in his purported official
)
capacities as a council member of the Picayune
)
Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians; a representative )
of the Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; )
and a representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing )
)
Authority; and
MELVIN ESPE, in his purported official capacities as )
)
a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the
)
Chukchansi Indians, a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority.
)
Defendants.
)
)

27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:13-cv-04825-RS

1

This Court having received and considered the Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause

2

appearing therefore, hereby orders that the briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

3

Judgment and Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is:

4

May 19, 2014

Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment;

5

May 19, 2014

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the

6
7

Pleadings;
June 4, 2014

8

Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment; and

June 4, 2014
10

Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for
Judgment on the Pleadings

11
Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney LLP
1800 East Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14 Dated this ______ day of April, 2014.
22nd
15
___________________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
PROPOSED ORDER

Case No. 3:13-cv-04825-RS