Anderson v. Duran et al
Filing
28
ORDER TO COMPLETE PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/7/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
JOHN P. ANDERSON, in his official capacity as the ) CASE NO. 3:13-cv-04825-RS
)
Sheriff of Madera County, and individually,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
ORDER TO COMPLETE PRO HAC
)
) VICE APPLICATION
JACK DURAN, JR., in his purported official capacity )
as Judge of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi )
Indians Tribal Court;
)
DONNA HOWARD, in her purported official capacity )
as Clerk of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi )
)
Indians Tribal Court;
)
THE PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE
)
CHUKCHANSI INDIANS, a federally recognized
)
Indian Tribe;
)
CHUKCHANSI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
)
AUTHORITY, a wholly owned unincorporated entity )
of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians; )
CHUKCHANSI INDIAN HOUSING AUTHORITY, )
a wholly owned unincorporated entity of the Picayune )
Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians;
)
)
)
)
)
26
27
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
REGGIE LEWIS, in his purported official capacities )
)
as chairman of the Picayune Rancheria of the
)
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
)
CHANCE ALBERTA, in his purported official
)
capacities as vice chairman of the Picayune Rancheria )
of the Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
)
Authority;
CARL BUSHMAN, in his purported official capacities )
as a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the )
)
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
)
IRENE WALTZ, in her purported official capacities as )
a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the )
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
)
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
LYNN CHENOT, in her purported official capacities )
as a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the )
)
Chukchansi Indians; a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority;
)
DAVID CASTILLO, in his purported official
)
capacities as a council member of the Picayune
)
Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians; a representative )
of the Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; )
and a representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing )
)
Authority; and
MELVIN ESPE, in his purported official capacities as )
)
a council member of the Picayune Rancheria of the
)
Chukchansi Indians, a representative of the
)
Chukchansi Economic Development Authority; and a )
representative of the Chukchansi Indian Housing
)
Authority.
)
Defendants.
)
)
27
28
2
ORDER
1
At the hearing on October 17, 2013, counsel for the “Ayala Faction,” Lestor Marston,
2
represented that co-counsel, Melanie Daniel, would file an application for pro hac vice status
3
after the hearing. The court instructed her to do so. No such application appears in the record.
4
Accordingly, counsel is ordered to submit such an application on or before November 22, 2013.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated: November 7, 2013
_____________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?