Figy v. Lifeway Foods, Inc.
Filing
42
ORDER Granting 40 Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/08/14. Motion Hearing re-set for 5/12/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Thelton E. Henderson. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
David T. Biderman (Cal. Bar No. 101577)
DBiderman@perkinscoie.com
Joren S. Bass (Cal. Bar No. 208143)
JBass@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: 415.344.7000
Facsimile: 415.344.7050
Joseph J. Jacobi (Pro Hac Vice)
JJacobi@mcdonaldhopkins.com
Richard N. Kessler (Pro Hac Vice)
RKessler@mcdonaldhopkins.com
MCDONALD HOPKINS LLC
300 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2100
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: 312.280.0111
Facsimile: 312.280.8232
Attorneys for Defendant
LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
ROBERT E. FIGY, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
17
Plaintiff,
18
Case No. 3:13-CV-04828 TEH
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION
TO DISMISS
v.
19
Action Filed: October 17, 2013
LIFEWAY FOODS, INC.,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04828 TEH
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause showing, the hearing on
3
Defendant Lifeway Foods, Inc.’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is
4
hereby continued from April 14, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., to May 12, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., in
5
Courtroom 2 of the above-referenced Court.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED: 04/08/14
10
_______________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
11
12
13
LEGAL120419369.1
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-04828 TEH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?