Vaughns et al v. Homeward Residential, Inc. et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Answer Complaint filed by Homeward Residential, Inc., Power Default Services, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 13, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Eric D. Houser, Esq. (SBN 130079)
John P. Ward (SBN 274895)
HOUSER & ALLISON
A Professional Corporation
9970 Research Drive
Irvine, California 92618
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC., F/K/A/ AMERICAN HOME
MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., POWER DEFAULT SERVICES, INC., and U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR MASTR ADJUSTABLE RATE
MORTGAGES TRUST 2007-1, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES
2007-1
LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY L. MCCANDLESS
Timothy L. McCandless, Esq., SBN 147715
4740 Green River Road, Suite 208
Corona, California 92880
Attorneys for Plaintiffs THOMAS E. VAUGHNS; BESSIE M. VAUGHNS

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO

16
17

THOMAS E. VAUGHNS; BESSIE M.
VAUGHNS,

Hon. Jon S. Tigar
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Case No.: 3:13-cv-04846-JST

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
ANSWER COMPLAINT

v.
HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC.,
F/K/A AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
SERVICING, INC.; POWER DEFAULT
SERVICES, INC.; U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS
TRUSTEE FOR MASTR ADJUSTABLE
RATE MORTGAGES TRUST 2007-1,
MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1; and
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

[L.R. 6-1]

26
Defendants.
27
28
ORDER
1

1

This matter having come before the Court on the stipulation to extend time for

2

Defendants HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC., F/K/A/ AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE

3

SERVICING, INC., POWER DEFAULT SERVICES, INC., and U.S. BANK NATIONAL

4

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR MASTR ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGES TRUST

5

2007-1, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-1 to file a

6

responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint, and the Court having considered the matter herein.

7

THEREFORE it is ORDERED as follows:

8

The time for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Complaint by Defendants is

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

15

n S.
J u d ge J o

ER

H

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
2

R NIA

I

NO

14

___________________________________
ED
ORDER
HON. JONSO
T IS S. TIGAR

Ti ga r

FO

13

May 13, 2014
Dated: __________________

LI

12

UNIT
ED

11

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA

RT
U
O

S

10

extended by one week, up to and including May 20, 2014.

A

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C