Halim v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 20

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DIRECTING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO TO SERVE PLAINTIFF BY 12/18/2013 AND FILE PROOF OF SERVICE BY 12/19/2013. Show Cause Response due by 1/2/2014.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/16/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2013) Modified on 12/16/2013 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

CECILIA HALIM,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiff,

No. C 13-04854 JSW

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE

Defendants.
/

14
15

On December 3, 2013, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) to plaintiff

16

Cecilia Halim (“Plaintiff”) why the pending motion to dismiss should not be granted in light of

17

her failure to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition and why this case should

18

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff failed to respond by the deadline of

19

December 13, 2013. However, the Court notes that Plaintiff did not receive notice due to her

20

counsel’s failure to register with the electronic case filing (“ECF”) system as required by the

21

Northern District Civil Local Rules. See Civ. L.R. 5-1(c). Therefore, the Court HEREBY

22

DIRECTS defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to serve a copy of this Order by

23

mail, as well as the OSC issued on December 3, 2013, by no later than December 18, 2013.

24

Wells Fargo shall file a proof of service by no later than December 19, 2013.

25

Plaintiff’s counsel shall immediately become an ECF user, obtain a user ID and

26

password, and register his email address for service, as required by the Local Rules. The Court

27

HEREBY EXTENDS Plaintiff’s deadline to file a response to the OSC issued on December 3,

28

1

2013 to January 2, 2014. Plaintiff is again admonished that her failure to respond the OSC by

2

January 2, 2014, will result in a dismissal of this action without further notice.

3

If Plaintiff seeks to file a substantive response to Wells Fargo’s motion and

4

demonstrates good cause for her delay, the Court will provide Wells Fargo with an opportunity

5

to file a reply brief.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: December 16, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2