Illinois Union Insurance Company v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Filing
110
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 21, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
9
10
Case Nos. 13-cv-04863-JST; 13-cv-5801JST; 15-cv-4834-JST
12
13
AND CONSOLIDATED CASES
14
15
Yesterday the Court conducted a case management conference concerning the scheduling
16
of the trial or trials in these consolidated cases. Having carefully considered both the parties’ case
17
management statements, ECF Nos. 106 &107, and their arguments at the conference, the Court
18
believes that further briefing is required before the Court can set a case schedule. Accordingly, the
19
parties are hereby ordered to brief the following issue: Does Intuitive Surgical have a right to a
20
jury trial under the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution regarding its breach of
21
contract claim, which right would require the Court to schedule a trial on Intuitive Surgical's
22
breach of contract claim prior to or simultaneously with a bench trial on the insurers' rescission
23
claims?
24
Intuitive Surgical shall file an opening brief not to exceed 15 pages within seven court days
25
of this order. The insurers shall file a single joint response brief not to exceed 15 pages within
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
seven court days of Intuitive's brief. Intuitive will then have three court days to file a reply brief
2
not to exceed 5 pages.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 21, 2016
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?