Illinois Union Insurance Company v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 69 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time to Respond to Cross-Complaint filed by Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 10, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

RONALD P. SCHILLER (PA SBN 41357) (Appearance Pro hac vice)
SHARON F. MCKEE (PA SBN 81499) (Appearance Pro hac vice)
JACQUELINE R. DUNGEE (PA SBN 87904) (Appearance Pro hac vice)
HANGLEY ARONCHICK SEGAL PUDLIN & SCHILLER
One Logan Square, 27th Floor
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
GARY T. LAFAYETTE
APRIL P. SANTOS
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
101 Mission Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Cross-Claim Defendant
IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation
Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23

v.
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

26

Judge: Honorable J. Tigar

NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff,

27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT

Defendant.

24
25

Case No.: 3:13-cv-04863-JST
Case No.: 3:13-cv-005801-JST

v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
Case No.: 3:13-cv-04863 JST; 3:13-cv-05801 JST

1
2

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

3

Defendant.

4
5
6

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
Cross-Complainant,

7
v.

8
9
10

IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE
CO., an Arizona corporation,
Cross Defendant.

11
12
13

WHEREAS, defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Intuitive”) filed its Cross-Complaint in this

14

action against defendant Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co. (“Ironshore”) on March 3, 2015;

15

WHEREAS, on March 19, 2015, the parties stipulated to an extension of the time for

16

Ironshore to answer, plead or otherwise move in response to the Cross-Complaint until April 10,

17

2015 (Doc. 62);

18
19
20

WHEREAS, Ironshore has requested a further extension of two business days, to April 14,
2015, to accommodate scheduling conflicts;
WHEREAS, on this 10th day of April 2015, Intuitive agreed to Ironshore’s request for a

21

extension of time through and including April 14, 2015 to respond or otherwise plead to the Cross-

22

Complaint;

23

WHEREAS, the requested extension will not affect any other deadlines in the case;

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Intuitive and

25

Ironshore, pursuant to Civ. L. R. 6-2(a) that Ironshore shall have an extension of time, through and

26

including April 14, 2015, within which to respond to the Cross-Complaint filed by Intuitive.

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
Case No.: 3:13-cv-04863 JST; 3:13-cv-05801 JST

1

Dated: April 10, 2015

HANGLEY ARONCHICK SEGAL PUDLIN &
SCHILLER

2
By: /s/Sharon F. McKee
Ronald P. Schiller
Sharon F. McKee
Jacqueline R. Dungee

3
4

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
By: /s/Gary T. Lafayette
Gary T. Lafayette
April P. Santos

5
6
7

Attorneys for Cross-Claim Defendant
IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY

8
9
10

Dated: April 10, 2015

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &
FLOM LLP
By: /s/Peter Luneau
Peter Luneau
Thomas E. Haroldson
Raoul Kennedy

11
12
13

Attorneys for Cross-Claim Plaintiff
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

14
15
16
17
18

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence of Peter Luneau, counsel for CrossComplainant, for the filing of this stipulation.

19
20

/s/ Sharon F. McKee
SHARON F. MCKEE

21
22
23
24
25

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 10, 2015
Honorable Jon S. Tiger
United States District Court Judge

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-COMPLAINT
Case No.: 3:13-cv-04863 JST; 3:13-cv-05801 JST