Miletak v. Communication Workers of America (CWA) et al

Filing 56

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 52 53 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/9/2014)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 13-4865 SI

NICK MILETAK,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff,
v.
COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF
AMERICA (CWA)
Defendant.

/

13

In an order filed April 22, 2014, the Court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint

14

and granted plaintiff leave to amend the complaint, and denied plaintiff’s motion for sanctions. Docket

15

No. 51. The Court’s order directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint by May 2, 2014.

16

On May 2, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the denial of the sanctions

17

motion, and filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The motion for reconsideration is

18

DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint was unnecessary as the Court’s

19

April 22, 2014 order already granted plaintiff leave to amend. Plaintiff is directed to file the amended

20

complaint no later than May 16, 2014, and defendant shall either answer the amended complaint or

21

file a motion pursuant to Rule 12. This order resolves Docket Nos. 52 and 53.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: May 9, 2014
____________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE