Beal et al v. Royal Oak Bar et al

Filing 144

ORDER. Case referred to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James to conduct a settlement conference to occur within sixty days, or as soon as her schedule permits. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/24/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division United States District Court Northern District of California 11 MICHAEL BEAL, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. Case No. 3:13-cv-04911-LB ORDER 14 ROYAL OAK BAR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Case referred to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James to conduct a settlement conference to occur within sixty days, or as soon as her schedule permits. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: May 24, 2016 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ____________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 MICHAEL BEAL, et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-04911-LB Plaintiffs, 6 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 8 ROYAL OAK BAR, et al., Defendants. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 12 13 14 15 16 That on May 24, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 17 18 19 Ares Papageorge 552 47th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94121 20 21 22 23 Dated: May 24, 2016 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 By:________________________ Lashanda Scott, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable LAUREL BEELER 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?