Beal et al v. Royal Oak Bar et al
Filing
77
SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. This order supersedes the "Amended Case Management Order" filed on February 23, 2013 at ECF No. 76. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/23/2015. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
MICHAEL BEAL, et al.,
12
13
Plaintiffs,
No. C13-04911 LB
SECOND AMENDED CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
14
ROYAL OAK BAR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
___________________________________/
16
17
18
Following the Case Management Conference held on February 19, 2015, the Court orders that
the following are the amended disclosure, filing, and hearing dates for the case:
19
21
22
23
24
Filing Date/Disclosure
Deadline/Hearing Date
Settlement Conference
7/2/2015
Non-expert discovery completion date
20
Case Event
5/22/2015
Expert disclosures required by Federal Rules of Civil
5/22/2015
Procedure
Rebuttal expert disclosures
6/5/2015
25
Expert discovery completion date
6/30/2015
26
Last hearing date for dispositive motions and/or further case
management conference
8/13/2015, at 9:30 a.m.
Meet and confer re pretrial filings
8/21/2015
27
28
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER
CV13-04911 LB
1
Pretrial filings due
8/31/2015
2
Oppositions, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo Designations due
9/8/2015
3
Final Pretrial Conference
9/24/2015, at 1:30 p.m.
4
Trial
10/5/2015, at 8:30 a.m.
5
Length of Trial
5 days
6
This order supersedes the “Amended Case Management Order” filed on February 23, 2013 at ECF
7
No. 76.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 23, 2015
__________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER
CV13-04911 LB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?