Beal et al v. Royal Oak Bar et al

Filing 77

SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. This order supersedes the "Amended Case Management Order" filed on February 23, 2013 at ECF No. 76. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/23/2015. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 MICHAEL BEAL, et al., 12 13 Plaintiffs, No. C13-04911 LB SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. 14 ROYAL OAK BAR, et al., 15 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 16 17 18 Following the Case Management Conference held on February 19, 2015, the Court orders that the following are the amended disclosure, filing, and hearing dates for the case: 19 21 22 23 24 Filing Date/Disclosure Deadline/Hearing Date Settlement Conference 7/2/2015 Non-expert discovery completion date 20 Case Event 5/22/2015 Expert disclosures required by Federal Rules of Civil 5/22/2015 Procedure Rebuttal expert disclosures 6/5/2015 25 Expert discovery completion date 6/30/2015 26 Last hearing date for dispositive motions and/or further case management conference 8/13/2015, at 9:30 a.m. Meet and confer re pretrial filings 8/21/2015 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER CV13-04911 LB 1 Pretrial filings due 8/31/2015 2 Oppositions, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo Designations due 9/8/2015 3 Final Pretrial Conference 9/24/2015, at 1:30 p.m. 4 Trial 10/5/2015, at 8:30 a.m. 5 Length of Trial 5 days 6 This order supersedes the “Amended Case Management Order” filed on February 23, 2013 at ECF 7 No. 76. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2015 __________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER CV13-04911 LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?