Booth et al v. Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. et al

Filing 10

GRANTED AS MODIFIED STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Waiver of Service and Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by Peter K. Kompaniez, Robert N. Ruth, Jeffrey S. Rogers, Arthur M. Friedman, Strategic Realty Trust, Inc., Phillip I. Levin. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 18, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2013)

1
2
3

DLA PIPER LLP (US)
DAVID PRIEBE (State Bar No. 148679)
[e-mail]
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Phone: [phone] | Fax: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

DAVID CLARKE, JR. (pro hac vice application
forthcoming)
[e-mail]
500 Eighth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Phone: [phone] | Fax: [phone]
GLEN ALLEN (pro hac vice application forthcoming)
[e-mail]
The Marbury Building
6225 Smith Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21209-3600
Phone: [phone] | Fax: [phone]

11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants STRATEGIC REALTY
TRUST, INC. (f/k/a TNP STRATEGIC RETAIL
TRUST, INC.), PHILLIP I. LEVIN, ARTHUR M.
FRIEDMAN, JEFFREY S. ROGERS, ROBERT N.
RUTH, and PETER K. KOMPANIEZ

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LEWIS BOOTH, as Trustee for the Booth
Trust dated 11-20-96, and STEPHEN
DREWS, on behalf of themselves and all
other similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. (f/k/a
TNP STRATEGIC RETAIL TRUST, INC.),
THOMPSON NATIONAL PROPERTIES,
LLC, TNP STRATEGIC ADVISOR, LLC,
TNP SECURITIES, LLC, ANTHONY W.
THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER S.
CAMERON, JAMES R. WOLFORD, JACK
R. MAURER, PHILLIP I. LEVIN, ARTHUR
M. FRIEDMAN, JEFFREY S. ROGERS,
ROBERT N. RUTH, and PETER K.
KOMPANIEZ,
Defendants.

Case No. CV 13 4921 JST
Class Action
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

EAST\65218537.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIP EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
NO. CV 13 492 JST

1
2
3

Upon review of the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint,
signed by the parties hereto, the Court hereby approves said Stipulation and orders as follows:

1.

Defendants are not required to respond to the Complaint in this action or any

4

complaint in an action consolidated into this action, until after the appointment of a Lead

5

Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff's counsel.

6

2.

If the appointed Lead Plaintiff elects to file an Amended Complaint,

7

such Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than 45 days following entry of the order by the

8

Court appointing Lead Plaintiff.

9

3.

The Stipulating Defendants shall respond to the Amended Complaint, or the

10

current Complaint if Lead Plaintiff elects not to file an Amended Complaint, no later than 90

11

days following entry of the order by the Court appointing Lead Plaintiff.

12

4.

By entering into this stipulation, the Defendants do not intend to waive and do not

13

waive any rights or defenses otherwise available or that may become available in the course of

14

the above-captioned action and any related or consolidated actions.

15
16

Opposition and reply briefs shall be filed on the timelines provided in the Local Rules, absent an

17

order of this Court upon a showing of good cause.

S

NO

22

RT

n S.
J u d ge J o

R NIA

21

Ti ga r

FO

DATED: December 18, 2013.

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
DIFIED
AS MO

H

24
25

LI

HON. JON S. TIGAR
UNITED E
STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

23

RN

A

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

19

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

EAST\65218537.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIP EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
NO. CV 13 492 JST